Uncovering paradoxes from physicians’ experiences of patient-centered ward-round

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to uncover paradoxes emerging from physicians' experiences of a patient-centered and team-based ward round, in an internal medicine department. Design/methodology/approach Abductive reasoning relates empirical material to complex responsive processes theory in a dialectical process to further understandings. Findings This paper found the response from physicians, to a patient-centered and team-based ward round, related to whether the new demands challenged or confirmed individual physician's professional identity. Two empirically divergent perspectives on enacting the role of physician during ward round emerged: We-perspective and I-perspective, based on where the physician's professional identity was centered. Physicians with more of a We-perspective experienced challenges with the new round, while physicians with more of an I-perspective experienced alignment with their professional identity and embraced the new round. When identity is challenged, anxiety is aroused, and if anxiety is not catered to, then resistance is likely to follow and changes are likely to be hampered. Practical implications For change processes affecting physicians' professional identity, it is important for managers and change leaders to acknowledge paradox and find a balance between new knowledge that needs to be learnt and who the physician is becoming in this new procedure. Originality/value This paper provides increased understanding about how physicians' professional identity is interacting with a patient-centered ward round. It adds to the knowledge about developing health care in line with recent societal requests and with sustainable physician engagement.

Experiences from implementing value-based healthcare at a Swedish University Hospital – a longitudinal interview study

“…Then new patterns of thinking and behaving can be developed in the organization [ 36 ]. It is important for managers to understand and respect that contradictory opinions can exist at the same time in the same organization [ 37 ] in order to facilitate the process of change.…”

Leading implementation of the management innovation value-based healthcare at a Swedish University Hospital

“…Another explanation might be that implementing VBHC was seen as a break in the NPM trend. [12,14] Even if concern for the patients is a key to increased engagement by health professionals, [36] this study has solely focused on health professionals as leaders for implementing VBHC. Therefore no answers are given regarding patients' experiences of the implementation of VBHC.…”

The possible impact of vulnerability on clinical communication: Some reflections and a call for empirical studies

“…Here physician vulnerability becomes exposed as grief, which may induce embarrassment and shame (25), or loneliness and powerlessness as part of professional responsibility (26). In a qualitative study following an intervention to change the ward-round routines in a Swedish hospital to reduce medical errors, it was found that the attending physicians' ability to adjust to the new routines was better when they applied a "We-perspective" rather than an "I-perspective" on their work (27). The former perspective was characterized by a focus on teamwork, other providers' input was considered essential, and conversation with the patient was given priority compared to reading the record.…”

“…Medical culture in the scientific era may have developed an unhealthy aim of eliminating uncertainty (28). If staying in control is the overarching paradigm of the working climate you are part of, loss of control means loss of confidence from peers and represents a major threat to your position and sometimes identity (17,27,29). It probably takes repeated unpleasant emotional experiences before many physicians are able to recognize and acknowledge their own vulnerability.…”