2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01523-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering how animals use combinations of magnetic field properties to navigate: a computational approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For actual migration systems, this has only been assessed for migration based on correlated random walks—per definition less directed than compass courses—with supplemental navigational abilities based on geomagnetic information [ 38 ]. While gradient-based navigation using innate or early-learned information offers the possibility to correct for imprecision or displacement [ 88 ], e.g., by currents, it could also produce inefficient migrations when gradients in field components are closely aligned [ 9 , 29 , 38 , 90 ]. Our results suggest that constant-heading migration modulated by magnetic signposts could be sufficiently robust to variable and changing geomagnetic fields, at least given suitable compass precision and intrinsic variability in inherited headings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For actual migration systems, this has only been assessed for migration based on correlated random walks—per definition less directed than compass courses—with supplemental navigational abilities based on geomagnetic information [ 38 ]. While gradient-based navigation using innate or early-learned information offers the possibility to correct for imprecision or displacement [ 88 ], e.g., by currents, it could also produce inefficient migrations when gradients in field components are closely aligned [ 9 , 29 , 38 , 90 ]. Our results suggest that constant-heading migration modulated by magnetic signposts could be sufficiently robust to variable and changing geomagnetic fields, at least given suitable compass precision and intrinsic variability in inherited headings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, more advanced naïve migrant abilities beyond compass-based movement have been proposed to explain enhanced orientation correction following displacement 4 , or control of naïve trans-oceanic migration routes 72 . Naïve migrants are accordingly proposed to gauge gradients in both geomagnetic intensity and inclination along their inaugural route, to either adjust (inherited) compass headings as a corrective measure 4 , 69 , or else perform gradient-based navigation towards (inherited) geomagnetic goal signatures 73 , 74 . Apart from perceptive and cognitive feasibility, the efficacy of the former ability and the efficiency of the latter remains to be established, in particular given the overall N–S gradients in both geomagnetic intensity and inclination 74 , 75 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For actual migration systems, this has only been assessed for migration based on correlated random walks – per definition less directed than compass courses – with supplemental navigational abilities based on geomagnetic information (32). While an innate or early-learned navigational ability offers the possibility to correct for imprecision or displacement, e.g., by currents, it could also produce inefficient migrations whenever gradients in field components are closely aligned (29,90). Our results suggest that constant-heading migration modulated by magnetic signposts could be sufficiently robust to variable and changing geomagnetic fields, at least given suitable intrinsic variability in inherited headings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence suggests that naïve oceanic (9) and avian (10,28) migrants indeed can use geomagnetic information to mediate orientation shifts, but is inconclusive regarding which magnetic components are used and the extent to which updated headings are either extrapolated in situ or predetermined, i.e., inherited. If the former, naïve migrants have been proposed to reach inherited magnetic “signature” locations by following perceived or extrapolated gradients in bi-coordinate geomagnetic components, e.g., inclination and intensity, (9,29). Alternatively, naïve migrants could potentially mediate switches ( Zugknicks ) between a fixed sequence of inherited headings upon passing inherited magnetic signposts, e.g., a threshold value of inclination or intensity (6,9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%