2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.808751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncoupling Molecular Testing for SARS-CoV-2 From International Supply Chains

Abstract: The rapid global rise of COVID-19 from late 2019 caught major manufacturers of RT-qPCR reagents by surprise and threw into sharp focus the heavy reliance of molecular diagnostic providers on a handful of reagent suppliers. In addition, lockdown and transport bans, necessarily imposed to contain disease spread, put pressure on global supply lines with freight volumes severely restricted. These issues were acutely felt in New Zealand, an island nation located at the end of most supply lines. This led New Zealand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical diagnostic testing in labs with The College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CAP/CLIA) approval was the early gold standard in testing, but its reliance on RNA extraction reagents, approved nasal swabs, and transport medium, and the need for well-trained personnel to staff the testing labs, meant that the availability of these tests early on was scarce. Other groups evaluated alternative extraction methods, the cost-effectiveness of various tests, and the use of alternative reagents to circumvent the challenges in replicating these clinical-grade tests [13][14][15]. Some groups have even suggested AI-based imaging solutions to detect COVID-19 infection due to the cost and time required to perform RT-PCR [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical diagnostic testing in labs with The College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CAP/CLIA) approval was the early gold standard in testing, but its reliance on RNA extraction reagents, approved nasal swabs, and transport medium, and the need for well-trained personnel to staff the testing labs, meant that the availability of these tests early on was scarce. Other groups evaluated alternative extraction methods, the cost-effectiveness of various tests, and the use of alternative reagents to circumvent the challenges in replicating these clinical-grade tests [13][14][15]. Some groups have even suggested AI-based imaging solutions to detect COVID-19 infection due to the cost and time required to perform RT-PCR [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the chosen diagnostic method, the establishment of reliable protocols to produce enzymes with high yield and activity that are not covered by patents is essential to avoid the worldwide reagent shortage problems that happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. [30][31][32] This learned lesson may be crucial to deal with future threats of new pandemics, such as other respiratory and tropical diseases caused by infectious agents. 33,34 Another important lesson learned from the pandemic is the need to decentralize test performance, allowing for both faster diagnosis and access to remotely populated areas.…”
Section: Impact Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 These requirements limit fast decision-making processes on RT-qPCR test results. 6 Furthermore, the high sensitivity of RT-qPCR assays comes with the drawback of its long tail of RNA positivity in the postacute phase of COVID-19. 1,7 As a result, the interpretation of positive RT-qPCR data is often challenging, particularly with regard to shedding of infectious viral particles, despite the possibility of semiquantification of detected viral RNA expressed as cycle threshold (Ct).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are several limitations of RT‐qPCR testing, including considerable turn‐around‐time due to sample transportation to professional laboratories and testing; high demands on personnel, technical equipment and data transmission 5 . These requirements limit fast decision‐making processes on RT‐qPCR test results 6 . Furthermore, the high sensitivity of RT‐qPCR assays comes with the drawback of its long tail of RNA positivity in the postacute phase of COVID‐19 1,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%