2017
DOI: 10.1037/rep0000122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncorrected versus demographically-corrected scores on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in persons with traumatic brain injury and stroke.

Abstract: Objective: The association between demographic characteristics and neurocognitive performance is well established; however, clinicians may have difficulty selecting when to use uncorrected versus demographically corrected scores. We compared these score types in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, on the National Institutes of Health Toolbox—Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). Research Method: Adults with TBI and stroke were demographically matched to controls, and completed the NIHTB-CB. Pub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major studies in this population suggests women perform better in areas such as verbal memory, attention, and working memory ( Ratcliff et al., 2007 ), however the lack of normative test scoreuse/reporting with neuropsychological data reporting complicates interpretation of TBI-specific sex differences. In fact, demographic differences in NIH toolbox neuropsychological test score performance among TBI/Stroke populations account for ~1/3 of the variance in scores, a finding that drops to ~5% when correcting for demographic differences in the general population ( Nitsch et al., 2017 ). Our findings suggest that despite correcting for demographic influences on component score performance, women with TBI perform worse when adjusting for covariates like education and injury severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major studies in this population suggests women perform better in areas such as verbal memory, attention, and working memory ( Ratcliff et al., 2007 ), however the lack of normative test scoreuse/reporting with neuropsychological data reporting complicates interpretation of TBI-specific sex differences. In fact, demographic differences in NIH toolbox neuropsychological test score performance among TBI/Stroke populations account for ~1/3 of the variance in scores, a finding that drops to ~5% when correcting for demographic differences in the general population ( Nitsch et al., 2017 ). Our findings suggest that despite correcting for demographic influences on component score performance, women with TBI perform worse when adjusting for covariates like education and injury severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construct validity for the flanker task has been shown for traumatic brain injury , spinal cord injury (M. L. Cohen et al, 2017), and stroke patients (Carlozzi et al, 2017). Finally, base rate information (Holdnack et al, 2017) and test interpretation analyses (Nitsch et al, 2017) have been performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. Cohen et al, 2017), and stroke patients (Carlozzi et al, 2017). Finally, base rate information (Holdnack et al, 2017) and test interpretation analyses (Nitsch et al, 2017) have been performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NIHTB-CB has many advantages as it is: (1) applicable across the lifespan, (2) brief, (3) non-proprietary, (4) based on state-of-the-art test theories and technology, and (5) available in both English and Spanish versions (Mungas et al, 2014). The validity and utility of the battery has been shown in cognitively unimpaired adults (Heaton et al, 2014;Mungas et al, 2014;Weintraub et al, 2013), and clinical samples with spinal cord injury Cohen et al, 2017), traumatic brain injury (TBI; Nitsch et al, 2017;, stroke Carlozzi, Tulsky, et al, 2017;Nitsch et al, 2017;, and intellectual disabilities (Hessl et al, 2016). In addition, a study including adults with varied cognitive statuses provided supportive findings for the validity of NIHTB-CB in assessing neurocognitive domains related to dementia (Hackett et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%