2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.107.216403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconventional Temperature Enhanced Magnetism inFe1.1Te

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

22
138
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
22
138
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean-field treatment of the problem leads to qualitatively correct result for these compounds (with some important caveats [38][39][40] ). Because of this analogy we expect at low temperatures the d electrons in our model to delocalize due to the mixing with the itinerant bands through V (there are evidence of such crossover in the normal state of iron chalcogenides 41,42 ). This delocalization is described on a mean-field level by a phase transition, and the appearance a non-vanishing expectation value of b ≡ b, and can significantly change the electronic spectrum by opening a hybridization gap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean-field treatment of the problem leads to qualitatively correct result for these compounds (with some important caveats [38][39][40] ). Because of this analogy we expect at low temperatures the d electrons in our model to delocalize due to the mixing with the itinerant bands through V (there are evidence of such crossover in the normal state of iron chalcogenides 41,42 ). This delocalization is described on a mean-field level by a phase transition, and the appearance a non-vanishing expectation value of b ≡ b, and can significantly change the electronic spectrum by opening a hybridization gap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excess Fe resides in an interstitial site centered above (or below) a plaquette of four Fe sites. 18,19 The magnetic interaction between an interstitial and the Fe nearest-neighbors results in locally ferromagnetic correlations 20,21 and weak localization of the charge carriers, 22 and acts as a magnetic electron donor. 22 The excess Fe concentration is anticorrelated with the superconducting volume fraction and results in short-range magnetic order.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38] A recent study on Fe 1.1 Te has shown that the localized electrons that contribute to magnetism are not isolated from the itinerant ones, but instead are entangled, as indicated by a temperature-induced enhancement of the instantaneous magnetic moment. 20 In this paper, we use Cu to replace Fe in Fe 1.1 Te, aiming to study the impact of the weakly magnetic Cu dopants on the magnetic order, which we characterize with neutron scattering. We find that Cu drives down the structural and magnetic transitions, with longrange nearly-commensurate magnetic order retained in Fe 1.06 Cu 0.04 Te, but only short-range incommensurate order in FeCu 0.1 Te.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a careful investigation of the wave vector and energy dependence of spin excitations across the magnetic ordering temperature can provide important information concerning the nature of the magnetic order and spin-spin correlations. For example, a recent inelastic neutron scattering study of spin excitations in one of the parent compounds of iron-based superconductors, the iron chalcogenide Fe 1.1 Te which has a bicollinear antiferromagnetic (AF) structure and Néel temperature of T N = 67 K [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], reveals that the effective spin per Fe changes from S ≈ 1 in the AF state to S ≈ 3/2 in the paramagnetic state, thus providing evidence that Fe 1.1 Te is not a conventional Heisenberg antiferromagnet but a nontrivial local moment system coupled with itinerant electrons [12].Since antiferromagnetism may be responsible for electron pairing and superconductivity in iron-based superconductors [13,14], it is important to determine if the observed anomalous spin excitation behavior in iron telluride Fe 1.1 Te is a general phenomenon in the parent compounds of iron-based superconductors. For this purpose, we study the spin excitations of another parent compound of iron-based superconductors, the iron pnictide BaFe 2 As 2 which has a collinear AF structure with T N ≈ 138 K [15][16][17][18], over a wide temperature range (0.05T N ≤ T ≤ 2.1T N ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a careful investigation of the wave vector and energy dependence of spin excitations across the magnetic ordering temperature can provide important information concerning the nature of the magnetic order and spin-spin correlations. For example, a recent inelastic neutron scattering study of spin excitations in one of the parent compounds of iron-based superconductors, the iron chalcogenide Fe 1.1 Te which has a bicollinear antiferromagnetic (AF) structure and Néel temperature of T N = 67 K [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], reveals that the effective spin per Fe changes from S ≈ 1 in the AF state to S ≈ 3/2 in the paramagnetic state, thus providing evidence that Fe 1.1 Te is not a conventional Heisenberg antiferromagnet but a nontrivial local moment system coupled with itinerant electrons [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%