2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01058j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconventional micro-/nanofabrication technologies for hybrid-scale lab-on-a-chip

Abstract: Micro-/nanofabrication-based lab-on-a-chip (LOC) technologies have recently been substantially advanced and have become widely used in various inter-/multidisciplinary research fields, including biological, (bio-)chemical, and biomedical fields. However, such hybrid-scale LOC devices are typically fabricated using microfabrication and nanofabrication processes in series, resulting in increased cost and time and low throughput issues. In this review, after briefly introducing the conventional micro-/nanofabrica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(203 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NEMS biosensors correlate chemical or physical binding events with the mechanical motions of devices in nanometer scales, which in turn are converted into detectable electrical or optical signals. They have small form factor, extremely high sensitivity with a detection limit down to the single molecule level (Lim et al, 2015;Ha et al, 2016). The integration of ELMsbased structures with MEMS/NEMS devices has the potential to bring breakthroughs in fully functional and miniaturized ELMs-based sensors.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NEMS biosensors correlate chemical or physical binding events with the mechanical motions of devices in nanometer scales, which in turn are converted into detectable electrical or optical signals. They have small form factor, extremely high sensitivity with a detection limit down to the single molecule level (Lim et al, 2015;Ha et al, 2016). The integration of ELMsbased structures with MEMS/NEMS devices has the potential to bring breakthroughs in fully functional and miniaturized ELMs-based sensors.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details related to nanofluidic device fabrication technologies can be found in other review articles. [29][30][31][32]…”
Section: Materials and Fabrication Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Most previous studies on DO use conventional nanofabrication processes with limitations in the materials governing the zeta-potentials (ζ) of the channel surfaces, throughput, dimensions, and the number of nanopores/nanochannels. 10,11 This hindered DO investigation because the governing parameters could not be varied easily. Typically, electric signals are measured along a single nanochannel, which limits the quantification accuracy because of the low transport flux.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusioosmosis (DO) has attracted much attention in nanofluidic science − as a transport phenomenon universally occurring in nanopores and nanofluidic channels with surface charges under electrolyte gradients. , Typically, an electric double layer (EDL) features negligible DO at the microscale or in microfluidic channels (>2–50 ÎŒm); however, DO becomes dominant at the nanoscale and cannot be neglected . Additional investigations are needed to clarify the feasibility and practical implementation of DO-based nanofluidic systems, in which the relationships among the temperature, material properties, and ionic strength parameters in DO-driven ion transport are of significant interest. , Most previous studies on DO use conventional nanofabrication processes with limitations in the materials governing the zeta-potentials (ζ) of the channel surfaces, throughput, dimensions, and the number of nanopores/nanochannels. , This hindered DO investigation because the governing parameters could not be varied easily. Typically, electric signals are measured along a single nanochannel, which limits the quantification accuracy because of the low transport flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%