2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0213-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconventional Low-Cost Fabrication and Patterning Techniques for Point of Care Diagnostics

Abstract: The potential of rapid, quantitative, and sensitive diagnosis has led to many innovative ‘lab on chip’ technologies for point of care diagnostic applications. Because these chips must be designed within strict cost constraints to be widely deployable, recent research in this area has produced extremely novel non-conventional micro- and nano-fabrication innovations. These advances can be leveraged for other biological assays as well, including for custom assay development and academic prototyping. The technolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Their relatively low cost and 20 simplicity have made µPADs attractive for prototyping concepts in microanalysis, and perhaps in applications in areas such as medical diagnostics for resource-limited environments, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] environmental monitoring, [16][17][18][19] food safety testing, 20 and forensic analysis. 18,19 Despite their advantages, current paper microfluidic 25 technologies share some common disadvantages: limited minimum feature sizes (channel widths are generally greater than 200 µm) and inefficient delivery of sample within the device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Their relatively low cost and 20 simplicity have made µPADs attractive for prototyping concepts in microanalysis, and perhaps in applications in areas such as medical diagnostics for resource-limited environments, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] environmental monitoring, [16][17][18][19] food safety testing, 20 and forensic analysis. 18,19 Despite their advantages, current paper microfluidic 25 technologies share some common disadvantages: limited minimum feature sizes (channel widths are generally greater than 200 µm) and inefficient delivery of sample within the device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel nanotechnology approaches, in use with resulted molecular biologic data, for example include microfluidic technology and dip pen lithography. These methodologies have the potential to yield real-time, bedside results with high sensitivity and specificity [40].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current measured 1 s after applying the potential was recorded for each K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ] concentration.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ] solutions from 10 nM to 140 mM were prepared in 1 M KCl background electrolyte solution. A calibration curve was generated using device 2 through chronoamperometry using a CH Instruments 600E electrochemical workstation (Austin, TX) at a potential of 0.3 V…”
Section: F Electrochemical Detection Within Microfluidic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation