2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconstrained 3D-kinematics of prehension in five primates: Lemur, capuchin, gorilla, chimpanzee, human

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, investigation of the evolution of grasping is limited to inferences from bony morphology only, as this is all that is preserved in the fossil record [10,14,37]. Experimental studies, including the kinematics [38], electromyography of muscle use [8] or force experienced by the digits [39] during particular grasping tasks provide important information about the biomechanics of grasping, but may not be logistically or ethically feasible on extant primates and cannot be applied to extinct taxa. A lack of methods enabling the quantification of digit movement and dexterity directly from bony morphology has limited our understanding of evolution and variation of precision manipulation in primates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, investigation of the evolution of grasping is limited to inferences from bony morphology only, as this is all that is preserved in the fossil record [10,14,37]. Experimental studies, including the kinematics [38], electromyography of muscle use [8] or force experienced by the digits [39] during particular grasping tasks provide important information about the biomechanics of grasping, but may not be logistically or ethically feasible on extant primates and cannot be applied to extinct taxa. A lack of methods enabling the quantification of digit movement and dexterity directly from bony morphology has limited our understanding of evolution and variation of precision manipulation in primates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, manual grasping is generally thought to be associated primarily with feeding behaviour134. Although humans have long been considered as possessing the greatest dexterity during manual grasping2, all primates show the ability to grasp food and many of them use a variety of grip types567. Moreover, even among primates, food manipulation is associated with different ecological contexts and morphologies; hence, the uniqueness of the human hand only exists along a morphological and behavioural continuum2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mundinano et al, ). Their prehensile patterns were also highly comparable to other primates (including humans), in terms of the relative timings of their peak velocities and grip apertures (Reghem et al, ; Sartori, Camperio‐Ciani, Bulgheroni, & Castiello, b). Previous findings investigating hand preferences in marmosets were supported in the current study, demonstrating strong individual biases in hand preferences for unimanual tasks, with only one of the 10 animals showing no bias in their hand use (Cordeiro de Sousa et al, ; Hook & Rogers, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Next, the second channel adjusts the configuration of the hand mid‐flight according to the properties of the target object, such as its dimensions and weight to handle the “grasp” component. Studies of reaching to grasp behaviors have revealed fundamental properties being relatively conserved across primates capable of opposition (Reghem, Chèze, Coppens, & Pouydebat, ; Roy, Paulignan, Farnè, Jouffrais, & Boussaoud, ). However, there is limited knowledge surrounding these properties observed in primates that lack independent control of the digits such as the New World marmoset monkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%