2016
DOI: 10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconscious motivation. Part I: Implicit attitudes toward L2 speakers

Abstract: This paper reports the first investigation in the second language acquisition field assessing learners' implicit attitudes using the Implicit Association Test, a computerized reaction-time measure. Examination of the explicit and implicit attitudes of Arab learners of English (N = 365) showed that, particularly for males, implicit attitudes toward L2 speakers are associated with self-reported openness to the L2 group and with strength of correlations among attitudinal and motivational variables. Implicit attit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conducting longitudinal studies that sample learners’ experiences in an ongoing and iterative manner may be one way to address this shortcoming. We must also acknowledge the recent literature on unconscious motives or attitudes in L2 learning that are not captured through self‐report elicitation methods (Al–Hoorie, , ). Exploring this unconscious aspect through instruments that do not rely on self‐report data is a promising new avenue for the field, and its applications in language learning has begun to receive wider attention (e.g., Al–Hoorie, , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conducting longitudinal studies that sample learners’ experiences in an ongoing and iterative manner may be one way to address this shortcoming. We must also acknowledge the recent literature on unconscious motives or attitudes in L2 learning that are not captured through self‐report elicitation methods (Al–Hoorie, , ). Exploring this unconscious aspect through instruments that do not rely on self‐report data is a promising new avenue for the field, and its applications in language learning has begun to receive wider attention (e.g., Al–Hoorie, , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we explained above, the primary outcome variable used in the initial study was the Intended Effort scale. Admittedly, this Intended Effort scale—which has been used extensively for a decade—contains items that are generic in nature, inquiring, for example, about spending “a lot of effort” and “a lot of time” and studying “very hard.” Generic intentions are less likely to translate into behavior compared with more specific intentions and goals (Al‐Hoorie, , , ; Fishbein & Ajzen, ; Locke & Latham, ; Teimouri, ). Alternatively, it has been noted that, “If we want to draw more meaningful inferences about the impact of various motives, it is more appropriate to use some sort of a behavioural measure as the criterion/dependent variable” (Dörnyei & Ushioda, , p. 200, original emphasis).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore these effects, experimental methods are needed. So far, L2 motivation research has not given serious consideration to the possibility “of a parallel unconscious motivation influencing language learning” and the research agenda needs to be expanded to include investigations of unconscious motivational processes (Al‐Hoorie, , p. 424). The use of experimental techniques to study the influences of the cueing of relationship representations and interpersonal goals would constitute an important direction.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%