Uncompensated emotional labor, racial battle fatigue, and (in)civility in digital spaces

Abstract

Emotional labor was originally theorized by Arlie Hochschild in the context of domestic labor. Since her early theorization, popular culture and social scientists have adopted the term to refer to emotion work that is exhibited in a manner of financially compensated social settings. Emotional labor refers to the process by which individuals are expected to conform to a set of societal guidelines, ensuring that their emotions conform to that performance. As the use of social media grows, emotional labor plays an increasing role in the lives of people of color—across media platforms. We frame the ever‐present negotiation involved in racialized interactions online as a type of uncompensated emotional labor that results in racial battle fatigue. Next, we position emotional labor as an intrinsic part of the experience for social media users of color because digital media is by default a White, racialized space. Lastly, we argue that current research on civility does not account for the emotional labor of people of color. We offer an original view of uncompensated emotional labor that is inclusive of cross‐platform, racialized emotional labor that can result in racial battle fatigue.

Racial Differences in Women’s Role-Taking Accuracy: How Status Matters

“…Black women in U.S. society perform disproportionate expressive labor for which there are social, emotional, and material costs (Buckingham 2018;Cottingham et al 2018;Evans 2013;Williams, Bryant, and Carvell 2019). Expressive labor is largely invisible and uncompensated within conventional reward structures, and its allocation along status lines works to reproduce the existing social order, reflecting intersectional oppressions as they manifest at the micro, interpersonal level (Cho, Crenshaw, and McCall 2013;Collins 2002;Crenshaw 1989;Hooks 2000).…”

Development of Online Courseware for Low-Achieving Special Education Students Learning Communication

“…Special education is designed for each infant, toddler, preschooler, and elementary through high school student with disabilities and individuals up to the age of 21 to meet the unique learning needs [8]. Educators, parents, and students have different opinions and responses regarding the education concept.…”

Toward a Sociology of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for Research on Inequalities and Structural Change

“…Daniels (2018) demonstrated how white supremacists flourish in AI systems: decision-making protocols make racist content readily available, and companies refuse to ban such content from their platforms. Williams, Bryant, and Carvell (2019) documented the emotional cost to people of color who have to negotiate digital spaces that are simultaneously white racialized spaces. Calling attention to the structural, global dimensions of AI, McMillan Cottom (2020:443) argued that platform capitalism is racial capitalism, in which software constitutes sociopolitical regimes that produce “new forms of currency (i.e., data), new forms of exchange (e.g.…”