Second International Conference on Material Science, Smart Structures and Applications: Icmss-2019 2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5138816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty quantification of an aeronautical combustor using a 1-D approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach, the range of each input random variable is divided into intervals with equal probability. The methodology has been extensively used in a wide range of applications [17,18,19,20,21], including rotorcraft conceptual design [22] and uncertainty analysis with NASA rotorcraft sizing design tools [23]. Even with improved stratified sampling for uncertainty propagation, the MC approach with direct model evaluations is a computationally expensive process especially if high-fidelity simulations govern the solver.…”
Section: A Monte Carlo Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the range of each input random variable is divided into intervals with equal probability. The methodology has been extensively used in a wide range of applications [17,18,19,20,21], including rotorcraft conceptual design [22] and uncertainty analysis with NASA rotorcraft sizing design tools [23]. Even with improved stratified sampling for uncertainty propagation, the MC approach with direct model evaluations is a computationally expensive process especially if high-fidelity simulations govern the solver.…”
Section: A Monte Carlo Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the PC approach, only the optimum method is here reported: the graphs will show the MC in comparison with the Quadrature order (1 st order) and the total order (2 nd order) approximation only. Additional orders were previously studied [25] but the results proved how these methods are the most computational costeffective method with an optimum grade of accuracy for the results. The stochastic collocation has not been included since the results are the same as the QO method.…”
Section: Geometrical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%