2014
DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.v34n2.40596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty propagation of meteorological and emission data in modeling pollutant dispersion in the atmosphere

Abstract: Propagación de la incertidumbre de los datos meteorológicos y de emisión en el modelado de la dispersión de contaminantes en la atmósfera S. Diez 1 , E. Barra 2 , F. Crespo 3 and J. Britch 4 ABSTRACTVariability is true heterogeneity existing within a population that cannot be reduced or eliminated by more or better determinations. Uncertainty represents ignorance about poorly characterized phenomena, but it can be reduced by collecting more data. The aim of this paper was to study the impact of the variability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the complexity of environmental processes and interface interactions (Holnicki and Nahorski, 2015;Irwin, 2014), variance in measured and estimated pollutant concentrations where GI is present may be due to: (i) pollutant measurement error; (ii) model input uncertainties (Table 2); (iii) simplification of deposition processes (Section 3); and (iv) difficulties in treating GI in numerical solutions (Sections 4 and 5). Past studies have reported the effects of input data uncertainties on pollutant concentrations at different spatial scales, including: meteorology data uncertainty at mesoscale (Gilliam et al, 2015;Godowitch et al, 2015), emissions data uncertainty at macroscale (Diez et al, 2014;Holnicki and Nahorski, 2015) and at mesoscale (Saikawa et al, 2017), topography and land use data uncertainty at macroscale (Zou et al, 2016), and surface roughness uncertainty at macroscale (Barnes et al, 2014). The challenges to model inputs and processes, especially regarding the consideration of GI in air pollutant concentration simulations, primarily relate to: (i) spatio-temporal variation of GI characteristics such as shape and size, porosity, pollution tolerance and pollutant sink; (ii) pollutant transformation due to GI; and (iii) influences of meteorological and topographical data (such as temperature, humidity, terrain slope, wind speed and direction) on the deposition process.…”
Section: Challenges In Considering Gi For Dispersion Modelling At Microscale and Macroscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the complexity of environmental processes and interface interactions (Holnicki and Nahorski, 2015;Irwin, 2014), variance in measured and estimated pollutant concentrations where GI is present may be due to: (i) pollutant measurement error; (ii) model input uncertainties (Table 2); (iii) simplification of deposition processes (Section 3); and (iv) difficulties in treating GI in numerical solutions (Sections 4 and 5). Past studies have reported the effects of input data uncertainties on pollutant concentrations at different spatial scales, including: meteorology data uncertainty at mesoscale (Gilliam et al, 2015;Godowitch et al, 2015), emissions data uncertainty at macroscale (Diez et al, 2014;Holnicki and Nahorski, 2015) and at mesoscale (Saikawa et al, 2017), topography and land use data uncertainty at macroscale (Zou et al, 2016), and surface roughness uncertainty at macroscale (Barnes et al, 2014). The challenges to model inputs and processes, especially regarding the consideration of GI in air pollutant concentration simulations, primarily relate to: (i) spatio-temporal variation of GI characteristics such as shape and size, porosity, pollution tolerance and pollutant sink; (ii) pollutant transformation due to GI; and (iii) influences of meteorological and topographical data (such as temperature, humidity, terrain slope, wind speed and direction) on the deposition process.…”
Section: Challenges In Considering Gi For Dispersion Modelling At Microscale and Macroscalementioning
confidence: 99%