2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty of precipitation estimates in convective events by the Meteorological Service of Catalonia radar network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysing and combining precipitation data from both ground sensors and radar estimations should deliver more reliable information. Previous studies have approached this topic (Huff, ; Wescott et al , ; Trapero et al , ) by exploring different methods for this type of analysis, with a consensus view that rain gauge amounts refer to point accumulations, whereas radar‐derived values correspond to a volume‐averaged rainfall rate (Zawadzki, ; Villarini and Krajewski, ; Villarini et al , ). Ciach et al () admit that many factors influence the relationships between radar‐measured reflectivity, radar‐predicted rainfall amounts and rain gauge measurements, and they suggest the utility of studies on the difference between rain gauge and weather radar measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysing and combining precipitation data from both ground sensors and radar estimations should deliver more reliable information. Previous studies have approached this topic (Huff, ; Wescott et al , ; Trapero et al , ) by exploring different methods for this type of analysis, with a consensus view that rain gauge amounts refer to point accumulations, whereas radar‐derived values correspond to a volume‐averaged rainfall rate (Zawadzki, ; Villarini and Krajewski, ; Villarini et al , ). Ciach et al () admit that many factors influence the relationships between radar‐measured reflectivity, radar‐predicted rainfall amounts and rain gauge measurements, and they suggest the utility of studies on the difference between rain gauge and weather radar measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it results impossible to detect stratiform precipitation, and also, convective precipitation associated to orographic triggering (with developments not exceeding the 5-6 km). The analysis realized by Trapero et al (2009) with C-band weather radars in the same region showed that there practically no differences between results of short and long range product, when the QPE is compared with rain gauges values. Images have been treated previously by the AEMET (Sánchez-Diezma, 2001).…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams et al, 1989;Carey and Rutledge, 1996). Pineda et al (2007) and Pineda and Montanyà (2009) have analysed, in the region of the present study, the relationship between lightning and convective precipitation by means of the quantitative estimation of precipitation (QPE), obtained from radar reflectivity (Trapero et al, 2009). Results from these two studies show a good correlation between the daily amount of convective rainfall volume and CG flash counts.…”
Section: Relationship Between Lightning and Radar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%