2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2019.103934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in strain-rate from field measurements of the geometry, rates and kinematics of active normal faults: Implications for seismic hazard assessment

Abstract: Multiple measurements of the geometry, kinematics and rates of slip across the Auletta fault (Campania, Italy) are presented, and we use these to determine: (1) the spatial resolution of field measurements needed to accurately calculate a representative strain-rate; (2) what aspects of the geometry and kinematics would introduce uncertainty with regard to the strainrate if not measured in the field. We find that the magnitude of the post last-glacial maximum throw across the fault varies along strike. If such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depth chosen for the brittle/viscous transition is consistent with hypocentral depths and coseismic slip in the Apennines 44 46 , and consistent with previous modelling 10 , 11 . The annual rate of slip is calculated using the Holocene throws measured at surface, using new data and data from previous works 10 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 25 27 . A triangular profile is assumed for the interseismic slip distribution, by linearly interpolating between the values of slip-rate measured at the surface, and thereafter decreased to zero at the tips.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The depth chosen for the brittle/viscous transition is consistent with hypocentral depths and coseismic slip in the Apennines 44 46 , and consistent with previous modelling 10 , 11 . The annual rate of slip is calculated using the Holocene throws measured at surface, using new data and data from previous works 10 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 25 27 . A triangular profile is assumed for the interseismic slip distribution, by linearly interpolating between the values of slip-rate measured at the surface, and thereafter decreased to zero at the tips.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 c,d). Creep rates were assumed to be identical to slip-rates measured at the surface since 15 ± 3 ka 11 , with values from published sources and our own mapping 10 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 25 27 . Any postseismic afterslip on surface scarps would be included in surface slip values so the interseismic creep modelled includes postseismic afterslip, so we do not model postseismic stress changes due to viscoelastic afterslip separately 28 .…”
Section: Earthquake Deformation In the Southern Apennines And Model Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the availability of Fault2SHA-CAD, we can propose a new generation of fault-based PSHA with codes that are capable of analyzing complex database structures, linking the variability in the available geological data to the variability in hazard and risk assessment. Accounting for slip rate variability along faults is paramount in fault-based PSHA in order to avoid underestimating (or overestimating) hazard as already pointed out by Faure Walker et al (2019) and Sgambato et al (2020) on single faults. Here, we went a step beyond by incorporating multi fault ruptures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iezzi et al, 2018). If fault bends are not recognised, this could lead to overestimates of palaeoearthquake magnitudes from palaeoseismological trenches (Sgambato et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%