2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022gl097725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in Projected Changes in Precipitation Minus Evaporation: Dominant Role of Dynamic Circulation Changes and Weak Role for Thermodynamic Changes

Abstract: Earth's water cycle has already begun to change, and these changes will intensify as the climate warms (Allen & Ingram, 2002;Cubasch et al., 2001;Manabe & Wetherald, 1980;Mitchell, 1983), impacting societies and ecosystems throughout the world. The net water flux at the surface -precipitation minus evapotranspiration over land or precipitation minus evaporation over ocean (P − E) -is a key aspect of the water cycle as it regulates oceanic salinity and continental aridity (Allan et al., 2020;Durack et al., 2012… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is also valid at the regional scale (c.f. Figure 3) and is consistent with a previous study highlighting that moisture convergence is poorly constrained by global warming across both CMIP5 and CMIP6 models (Elbaum et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result is also valid at the regional scale (c.f. Figure 3) and is consistent with a previous study highlighting that moisture convergence is poorly constrained by global warming across both CMIP5 and CMIP6 models (Elbaum et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…panels b-d in Fig 1). Model versions within an acceptable range of climate sensitivity may poorly represent regional water cycle changes compared with models exhibiting climate sensitivity that is deemed too high or too low, and there is increasing evidence that narrowing climate sensitivity will not help constrain future hydroclimate changes in most regions [16]. Therefore, the AR6 advances in constraining global temperature projections have not so far resulted in more robust water cycle projections.…”
Section: Model Uncertainty In Global Water Cycle Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D). This land-sea contrast is intriguing because it is sometimes assumed that surface evaporation will increase proportionally to the control evaporation under warmer conditions ( 6 ). However, possible changes in both soil moisture and plant stomatal conductance can invalidate this hypothesis over land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapter 8 pointed out that water cycle changes result not only from changes in precipitation patterns but also from an increase in the atmospheric evaporative demand because of greater warming over land than over the ocean and, consequently, a reduction in continental near-surface RH (2)(3)(4). However, both observed and simulated changes in evapotranspiration, and in precipitation minus evaporation (P − E), are still very uncertain, even when globally averaged over land (2,5,6). Structural and parametric model uncertainties still dominate the overall uncertainty in climate projections (2,7), and the gap between understanding and predicting water cycle changes has not been bridged from AR5 to AR6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%