2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in plant functional type distributions and its impact on land surface models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
101
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because if most of the cropland in this region belongs to class "12", using the corresponding value for class "10" in the cross-walking table (90 % for class "10" vs. 30 % for class "12", Table S1) overestimates cropland areas. Hartley et al (2017) also investigated the uncertainty in simulations of carbon, water and energy fluxes from three LSMs as a result of cross-walking table uncertainty. This study found that the spread in model outputs due to cross-walking uncertainty was higher than uncertainty due to the underlying LC maps (mapping algorithm; Hartley et al, 2017).…”
Section: Differences In Total Area Of Forest Cropland and Grasslandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is because if most of the cropland in this region belongs to class "12", using the corresponding value for class "10" in the cross-walking table (90 % for class "10" vs. 30 % for class "12", Table S1) overestimates cropland areas. Hartley et al (2017) also investigated the uncertainty in simulations of carbon, water and energy fluxes from three LSMs as a result of cross-walking table uncertainty. This study found that the spread in model outputs due to cross-walking uncertainty was higher than uncertainty due to the underlying LC maps (mapping algorithm; Hartley et al, 2017).…”
Section: Differences In Total Area Of Forest Cropland and Grasslandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartley et al (2017) also investigated the uncertainty in simulations of carbon, water and energy fluxes from three LSMs as a result of cross-walking table uncertainty. This study found that the spread in model outputs due to cross-walking uncertainty was higher than uncertainty due to the underlying LC maps (mapping algorithm; Hartley et al, 2017). Despite these uncertainties, satellites provide the only plausible way to derive the global maps of vegetation distribution needed to drive LSMs and validate dynamic global vegetation models.…”
Section: Differences In Total Area Of Forest Cropland and Grasslandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Which LC dataset is used in the model significantly affects the BVOC emission estimates Wang et al, 2011). There are two major sources of uncertainty in the PFTs: the accuracy of the LC map and the cross-walking table used to convert the LC classes to PFTs (Hartley et al, 2017). We used 61 sample points in Beijing and the surrounding area from the Land Cover Validation Dataset by Zhao et al (2014) as primary validation for the LC datasets.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Bvoc Emissions To Lai and Pftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-walking table used in E5 is the default table designed for the global scale. Therefore, two more sensitivity experiments were designed using the "minimum biomass" (minCW) and "maximum biomass" (maxCW) cross-walking tables provided by Hartley et al (2017) for CCI LC to examine the uncertainties associated with the cross-walking table. As shown in Table 6, the area fractions of broadleaf and needleleaf trees were 29.9 and 8.8 % in the maxCW simulation, respectively, which are similar to those of FROM and MODIS (Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Bvoc Emissions To Lai and Pftmentioning
confidence: 99%