2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44967-1_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in Noise Mapping: Comparing a Probabilistic and a Fuzzy Set Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the techniques proposed by the GUM, there is the fuzzy logic, which defines values in a real closed interval and applies functions with real numbers to its extension with fuzzy numbers [7]. The biggest problem of fuzzy logic as a tool to determine the uncertainty is the computational cost and complexity [8].…”
Section: General Methods To Calculate the Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the techniques proposed by the GUM, there is the fuzzy logic, which defines values in a real closed interval and applies functions with real numbers to its extension with fuzzy numbers [7]. The biggest problem of fuzzy logic as a tool to determine the uncertainty is the computational cost and complexity [8].…”
Section: General Methods To Calculate the Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study is therefore to analyze the noise levels at various locations within the Federal University of Technology, Owerri using Geographic Information System (GIS). According to De Muer and Botteldooren (2003), noise is mapped to display the spatiotemporal distribution in the studied environment. This study mapped the spatial distribution of noise using the ArcGIS Inverse Distance Weighted Model (IDW).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…..). The uncertainty of the noise levelcalculations and models has been widely studied [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], and is out of the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%