2018
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/18/8/103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in measurements of the distances of scattering screens in pulsar observations

Abstract: In our previous paper we investigated properties of the ionized interstellar medium in the direction of three distant pulsars: B1641-45, B1749-28 and B1933+16.We found that uniformly distributed scattering material cannot explain measured temporal and angular broadening. We applied a model for a thin scattering screen and found the distances to the scattering screens in all directions. In this paper, we consider more complicated models of scattering material distribution, such as models containing both a unifo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors present a list of 107 radio pulsars where gamma rays can be detected and of six gamma-ray pulsars with expected radio emission. Pulsars are also a subject of the paper by Fadeev (2018) but here they are used to probe the interstellar medium on the way from the pulsar to the observer. The author (a team member of the "RadioAstron" space experiment) considers thin scattering screens as well as distributed matter that affects our estimates of distances to the scattering screens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors present a list of 107 radio pulsars where gamma rays can be detected and of six gamma-ray pulsars with expected radio emission. Pulsars are also a subject of the paper by Fadeev (2018) but here they are used to probe the interstellar medium on the way from the pulsar to the observer. The author (a team member of the "RadioAstron" space experiment) considers thin scattering screens as well as distributed matter that affects our estimates of distances to the scattering screens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%