2018 Joint Propulsion Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in Inverted Pendulum Thrust Measurements

Abstract: An uncertainty analysis of a common configuration of electric propulsion thrust stand is presented. The analysis applies to inverted pendulum thrust stands operating in a null-coil configuration with in-situ calibration. Several sources of bias and precision uncertainty are discussed, propagated, and combined to form conservative estimates of the relative and absolute thrust uncertainties. A case study of the NASA Glenn Research Center Vacuum Facility 6 thrust stand is presented. For the thruster investigated,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VF-8 facility, shown in Figure 17, is a 1.5-m diameter, 4.5-m long chamber whose pumping train (including four 35inch diameter oil diffusion pumps) can achieve a base pressure of ~4 x 10 -7 Torr. A displacement-style, invertedpendulum thrust stand of heritage GRC design [14] was installed in VF-8 and tuned for low-thrust measurements with a maximum uncertainty [15] of ±2 %. Cathode testing for the NASA-H64M-LM was conducted in VF-56.…”
Section: A Vacuum Test Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VF-8 facility, shown in Figure 17, is a 1.5-m diameter, 4.5-m long chamber whose pumping train (including four 35inch diameter oil diffusion pumps) can achieve a base pressure of ~4 x 10 -7 Torr. A displacement-style, invertedpendulum thrust stand of heritage GRC design [14] was installed in VF-8 and tuned for low-thrust measurements with a maximum uncertainty [15] of ±2 %. Cathode testing for the NASA-H64M-LM was conducted in VF-56.…”
Section: A Vacuum Test Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific impulse I sp and anode efficiency η a were defined as I sp = T/ ṁa g and η a = T 2 /2 ṁa P d , respectively, where ṁa is the total anode mass flow rate, and P d is the discharge power. The root sum of square method was used to calculate the total error [35]. The derived error bars in figures 3(a)-(c) include the statistical error of the measurement, which indicates the 95% confidence interval of threetimes thrust measurement at each set point in table 1, and the inherent error of the thrust stand due to the thermal drift.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This thermal drift was accounted for in post-processing of the thrust values. Using the analysis technique developed by Mackey [22], which includes effects such as calibration variation, the weight of the thruster and stand, and inclination uncertainty, the uncertainty of the measurements reported here was determined to be approximately 0.8% of the highest measured thrust of this campaign, or approximately 36 mN. This value is dominated by uncertainty and resolution of the inclination control.…”
Section: E Thrust Standmentioning
confidence: 88%