2007
DOI: 10.1108/13664380780001094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in best value decision making

Abstract: The sheer volume of decisions taken within the public sector procurement process prevents perfect and complete information being obtained and applied to every best value tender analysis that is carried out. As such, uncertainty must be accepted as a feature of the best value decision-making process. • This paper reports research which is developing a methodology for utilising the uncertainty component in best value tender analysis in order to create a more transparent decision making process.• The main output … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology underpinning the support tool has already been used by RSL's to assist them in best value decision making processes (Phillips et al, 2007) and as the support tool has been produced as windows based software it is anticipated that it can be used to assist RSL's in evaluating the high volume of best value tenders in a more effective and efficient manner.…”
Section: Best Value Tendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology underpinning the support tool has already been used by RSL's to assist them in best value decision making processes (Phillips et al, 2007) and as the support tool has been produced as windows based software it is anticipated that it can be used to assist RSL's in evaluating the high volume of best value tenders in a more effective and efficient manner.…”
Section: Best Value Tendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique can incorporate the reality of uncertainty, i.e. the existence of multiple factors involved in a decision making process (see for example, Phillips, Martin, Dainty, & Price, 2007;Wu, Lee, Tah, and Aouad , 2007). AHP has been applied in multiple industry contexts, e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP has been applied in multiple industry contexts, e.g. petroleum (Dey, 2001), construction (Phillips, Martin, Dainty, & Price, 2007), textile (Shyjith, Ilangkumaran, and Kumanan, 2008); bridge construction (Dabous & Alkass, 2010); and bidding evaluation (Sipahi and Esen, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision maker has to make a decision in absence of complete information. Phillips, Martin, Dainty, & Price (2007) accommodated the multi objective decision making process within the UK construction industry. Also in UK construction industry, Wu, Lee, Tah, and Aouad (2007) employed multi-attribute AHP to determine the priority of the accessibility criteria.…”
Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to multi attributes, AHP has been used in different industries, such as petroleum (Dey, 2001), construction (Phillips, Martin, Dainty, & Price, 2007;Wu, Lee, J.H.M. Tah, and Aouad, 2007), textile (Shyjith, Ilangkumaran, and Kumanan, 2008); bridge construction (Dabous & Alkass, 2010); and bidding evaluation (Sipahi and Esen, 2010) and a tender decision process (Phillips, Martin, Dainty, & Price, 2007).…”
Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%