Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling 2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119163091.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in 3‐DGeological Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that the geological and geophysical layers are subject to some degree of subjectivity and to possible cognitive biases, as they result from human decisions (e.g., the choice of a conceptual model of the mineral deposit) or from indirect, incomplete and imperfect information (e.g., geophysical inversion, or interpolated information due to incomplete spatial coverage), which raises the question of the confidence to place in these layers [79,80]. This is the reason why they are used in the prospective stage to propose the primary boreholes in and around the detected anomalies, and their weight is often reduced against existing drilling data when designing the layout of infill boreholes for detailed exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the geological and geophysical layers are subject to some degree of subjectivity and to possible cognitive biases, as they result from human decisions (e.g., the choice of a conceptual model of the mineral deposit) or from indirect, incomplete and imperfect information (e.g., geophysical inversion, or interpolated information due to incomplete spatial coverage), which raises the question of the confidence to place in these layers [79,80]. This is the reason why they are used in the prospective stage to propose the primary boreholes in and around the detected anomalies, and their weight is often reduced against existing drilling data when designing the layout of infill boreholes for detailed exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty is pertinent to the quantification, and visualization of 3D geodata. Epistemic uncertainty arises from incomplete knowledge and can be reduced though new exploration, geological mapping, drilling, and sample analysis. , MB-consistent geological stock accounting presumes that the model’s system boundary (i.e., envelope of all 27 voxels in Figure ) remains fixed though time. This enables spatially explicit uncertainty attribution for every voxel to capture the evolution of knowledge over time (confidence intervals in Figure c).…”
Section: Geomodeling Of Materials Stocks and Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%