2022
DOI: 10.5194/hess-26-1673-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall–runoff modeling

Abstract: Abstract. Deep learning is becoming an increasingly important way to produce accurate hydrological predictions across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. Uncertainty estimations are critical for actionable hydrological prediction, and while standardized community benchmarks are becoming an increasingly important part of hydrological model development and research, similar tools for benchmarking uncertainty estimation are lacking. This contribution demonstrates that accurate uncertainty predictions can… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system estimates the uncertainty of the water stage following the approach detailed in Klotz et al (2022). The time-dependent distribution over the predicted stage is modeled using a (countable) mixture of asymmetric Laplacians (CMAL, Klotz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Stage Forecast Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system estimates the uncertainty of the water stage following the approach detailed in Klotz et al (2022). The time-dependent distribution over the predicted stage is modeled using a (countable) mixture of asymmetric Laplacians (CMAL, Klotz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Stage Forecast Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system estimates the uncertainty of the water stage following the approach detailed in Klotz et al (2022). The time-dependent distribution over the predicted stage is modeled using a (countable) mixture of asymmetric Laplacians (CMAL, Klotz et al, 2022). The parameters of this distribution are generated by feeding the hidden state of the forecast LSTM into a dedicated head layer for each forecasted time step.…”
Section: Stage Forecast Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting approach is the application of machine learning methods for uncertainty quantification. Klotz et al (2021) demonstrate how deep neural networks, typically thought of as black-box models, can be used to estimate uncertainties for a hydrological system, while also showing an example of how to obtain some measure of interpretability with a post hoc interrogation of fitted machine learning models. The power of careful implementations of machine learning methods which embed mechanistic insights into the model structure as an alternative for learning and uncertainty quantification for complex systems, rather than explicitly process-based modeling, is starting to be explored in the hydrological literature (Kratzert, Klotz, Herrnegger, et al, 2019;Kratzert, Klotz, Shalev, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Addressing Computational Expensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason might be the introduction of noise into the dataset during modelling. Although, deep learning models performed better with increasing data size [40][41][42][43][44], but the harmonic analysis procedure introduces noise and more bias to larger datasets. Further subsample analysis shows an improvement in NSE of almost all models that incorporated wind input from 0.67 to 0.90.…”
Section: Effect Of Wind Speed On Tide Prediction Using Deep Learning ...mentioning
confidence: 99%