2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.08828
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty estimation for molecular dynamics and sampling

Giulio Imbalzano,
Yongbin Zhuang,
Venkat Kapil
et al.
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also demonstrate how the committee model can be used to estimate the error both static-lattice quantities and finitetemperature thermodynamic averages. [45] In order to provide compelling arguments for the quality of the potential, we have tested the predictions across many different scenarios. Some, such as the calculation of static lattice properties, are directly comparable to the DFT predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We also demonstrate how the committee model can be used to estimate the error both static-lattice quantities and finitetemperature thermodynamic averages. [45] In order to provide compelling arguments for the quality of the potential, we have tested the predictions across many different scenarios. Some, such as the calculation of static lattice properties, are directly comparable to the DFT predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During molecular dynamics simulations, the uncertainty computed in this way allows to identify configurations that are poorly predicted, suggesting that the simulation is moving in previously unexplored regions of the phase space. It has recently been shown that this kind of uncertainty estimation can also be used to compute the error on thermodynamical averages, that results from the ML approximation of the reference potential [45]. We show an early application of this approach to the evaluation of the ML error for the pair distribution functions.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations