2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty-based informational masking in a vowel discrimination task for young and old Mongolian gerbils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the effect of SNR on the discrimination of speech sounds appears to be different for gerbils and humans. This finding also agrees with previous reports on discrimination of vowels and consonants for gerbils (Eipert and Klump, 2020b;Sinnott et al, 1997;Sinnott and Mosteller, 2001) and humans (Eipert et al, 2019). The saliency for the discrimination of vowels and consonants in gerbils is qualitatively similar to that of humans as indicated by the perceptual maps, but gerbils need higher SNRs for successful speech sound discrimination (Sinnott and Mosteller, 2001).…”
Section: General Speech Sound Discrimination Abilities In Gerbils And...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the effect of SNR on the discrimination of speech sounds appears to be different for gerbils and humans. This finding also agrees with previous reports on discrimination of vowels and consonants for gerbils (Eipert and Klump, 2020b;Sinnott et al, 1997;Sinnott and Mosteller, 2001) and humans (Eipert et al, 2019). The saliency for the discrimination of vowels and consonants in gerbils is qualitatively similar to that of humans as indicated by the perceptual maps, but gerbils need higher SNRs for successful speech sound discrimination (Sinnott and Mosteller, 2001).…”
Section: General Speech Sound Discrimination Abilities In Gerbils And...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies of masking in the context of acoustic signaling typically focus (either explicitly or implicitly) on energetic masking, even though informational masking is potentially more detrimental (Rosa & Koper, 2018). A few psychoacoustic studies have parsed informational from energetic masking in nonhuman animals (Branstetter et al, 2016; Cai and Dent, 2020; Eipert and Klump, 2020), and a few ecological studies have explored the idea that noise (primarily anthropogenic noise) acts as a distractor that causes animals to shift their attention away from behaviorally important tasks (Allen et al, 2021; Chan et al, 2010a; Chan et al, 2010b; Hubbard et al, 2015; Rochais et al, 2017). To the best of our knowledge, however, all such studies have evaluated the potential for informational masking outside the context of communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, SSA, while reflecting a kind of learning, may also itself be able to be modulated by learned information. Except for a few previous reports [31][32][33][34][35][36] , virtually all studies on SSA have been performed using sounds that did not carry any behavioural meaning. Interestingly, neurons in the thalamic reticular nucleus 37,38 , amygdala, and prefrontal cortex 39 , which are involved in selective attention 40 , also show SSA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%