2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of functional risk curves based on Gaussian processes

Abstract: A functional risk curve gives the probability of an undesirable event as a function of the value of a critical parameter of a considered physical system. In several applicative situations, this curve is built using phenomenological numerical models which simulate complex physical phenomena. To avoid cpu-time expensive numerical models, we propose to use Gaussian process regression to build functional risk curves. An algorithm is given to provide confidence bounds due to this approximation. Two methods of globa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density perturbation approach proposed in Lemaître et al 33 (and used in Sueur et al 38 and Iooss and Le Gratiet 46 ) consists of replacing the density f i of one input X i by a perturbed one f i δ , where δ R represents a shift of a moment (e.g. the mean or the variance).…”
Section: Principles Of Pli-quantiles Andpli-superquantilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density perturbation approach proposed in Lemaître et al 33 (and used in Sueur et al 38 and Iooss and Le Gratiet 46 ) consists of replacing the density f i of one input X i by a perturbed one f i δ , where δ R represents a shift of a moment (e.g. the mean or the variance).…”
Section: Principles Of Pli-quantiles Andpli-superquantilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all densities which have an equivalent shift in the chosen moment, f iδ is defined as that which minimizes the Kullback-Leibler divergence from f i . This method has been applied to compute a QoI that corresponds to a failure probability (Iooss and Le Gratiet, 2019;Perrin and Defaux, 2019), a quantile (Sueur et al, 2017;Larget, 2019) and a superquantile (Iooss et al, 2020;Larget and Gautier, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the disadvantage of over‐reliance on a large number of finite element samples by iterative method, Box et al 3 first proposed the experimental design of the response surface method. Many authors have used the response surface method for finite element model correction and for proposing improved methods 4–10 . The traditional response surface method mainly uses regression analysis to establish the response surface model instead of the complex finite element model; then, it approximates the target value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%