2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for the igneous scenario classes in the 2008 performance assessment for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goodwin et al, (30,31) Andres and Goodwin (32) TILA-99 Finland 1999 Vieno and Nordman (33) (38) Helton and Sallaberry, (39,40) Rechard et al, (41) Helton et al, (42,44,46,50,51,53) Hansen et al, (43,45,47,52) Sallaberry et al (48,49)…”
Section: Canada 1998mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Goodwin et al, (30,31) Andres and Goodwin (32) TILA-99 Finland 1999 Vieno and Nordman (33) (38) Helton and Sallaberry, (39,40) Rechard et al, (41) Helton et al, (42,44,46,50,51,53) Hansen et al, (43,45,47,52) Sallaberry et al (48,49)…”
Section: Canada 1998mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(26,40) The distributions of uncertain parameters can be derived from historical information or expert judgment, (58) such as in DeWispelare et al (89) and Neri et al (90) Once obtained, these distributions can be processed through uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis. (45,47,49,52,53) Uncertainty analysis evaluates how uncertain the model results are due to uncertainties in the model parameters. Sensitivity analysis identifies which parameters most influence the model results, so that efforts to reduce the remaining uncertainty can be focused on these parameters.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%