2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and Nonstationarity in Streamflow Extremes under Climate Change Scenarios over a River Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it would be necessary to account nonstationary analysis in modelling the hydrological extremes (Parey et al ., 2010; Cooley, 2013; Salas and Obeysekera, 2014). Recently, many studies have approached the development of nonstationary models to understand the influence of natural variability in extremes (Das and Umamahesh, 2017; Bracken et al ., 2018; Galiatsatou et al ., 2018). In this study, we investigated the nonstationary behaviour of extreme precipitation over India considering ENSO, IOD and AMO as nonstationary influences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it would be necessary to account nonstationary analysis in modelling the hydrological extremes (Parey et al ., 2010; Cooley, 2013; Salas and Obeysekera, 2014). Recently, many studies have approached the development of nonstationary models to understand the influence of natural variability in extremes (Das and Umamahesh, 2017; Bracken et al ., 2018; Galiatsatou et al ., 2018). In this study, we investigated the nonstationary behaviour of extreme precipitation over India considering ENSO, IOD and AMO as nonstationary influences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons behind the calling the results from standard/classical approach as possibly unreliable are, for example, non‐availability of sufficiently large and quality dataset, parameter uncertainty which is usually overlooked (Chandra et al ., 2015). Specifically, the classical approach uses the point estimate of the parameters obtained using different methods, namely L‐moments (Saf, 2009; Haddad et al ., 2011), method of moments (Lück and Wolf, 2016), and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE; Das and Umamahesh, 2017) and hence, not usually accounts for the uncertainty associated with the parameters. To overcome the issues and provide reliable estimates for risk assessment, Bayesian method offers a coherent framework and with advancement in the computational facility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent research, an emerging feature of all aspects of climate change scenarios is the growing use of probabilistic terms such as probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) which can provide detailed quantitative descriptions of uncertainties of climate change scenarios. Many studies (e.g., Giorgi and Mearns, 2003;Wilby and Harris, 2006;Kay et al, 2009;Prudhomme and Davies, 2009;Paeth et al, 2013;Gillingham et al, 2015;Das and Umamahesh, 2017;Sung et al, 2018;Mackay et al, 2019) have carried out the quantification of uncertainties in climate change impact assessment using meteorological parameters and expressed in probabilistic terms. Sometimes, an ensemble approach is also applied to deal with the uncertainty in climate scenarios because a specific scenario cannot represent all future climate conditions (Sung et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in climate change scenarios the risk and streamflow assessment is generally carried out through return periods under nonstationarity assumptions, as these assumptions enable to introduce time-varying concepts for better assessment (Cooley, 2013;Mondal and Mujumdar, 2016). The analysis of nonstationary approximations of the return levels under lower return periods may be more beneficial to design low-capacity hydraulic structures (Das and Umamahesh, 2017). The low flows are also significant parameters in hydrology (Kiely, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation