2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of various CO2-Based tracer-gas methods for estimating seasonal ventilation rates in classrooms with different mechanical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…eq. (7) ), the primary uncertainty of this calculation is likely the exhaled CO 2 emission rate uncertainty [ 80 , 81 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eq. (7) ), the primary uncertainty of this calculation is likely the exhaled CO 2 emission rate uncertainty [ 80 , 81 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the CO 2 measurement uncertainty could represent a secondary contribution to the AER back-calculation through the eq. 7, in fact, the uncertainty of the exhaled CO 2 emission rate could mainly affect the AER uncertainties [73,74].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ventilation rate was calculated separately for each experimental session by measuring the rate of decay of the concentration of metabolic CO 2 after each subject left the sleeping capsule 32–34 assuming that VR did not change whether the subjects were present or absent in the capsule; the rate of decay of CO 2 was used to estimate air change rate (ACH). Figure 4 shows an example of the measurements of CO 2 under two experimental conditions (T24P800 and T24P1700); the time periods used for estimating CER and ACH using the decay of CO 2 32–34 are indicated. The ACH was used to derive VR using the volume of the part of the capsule in which the subjects had been sleeping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%