2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of MR-PET image registration for precision neuro-PET imaging

Abstract: Highlights Novel methodology and software for MR-PET registration uncertainty analysis. Registration software had the biggest effect on MR-PET registration precision, followed by reconstruction parameters (i.e., iterations, smoothing) and PET count level. PVC can significantly improve the PET signal, but since it relies on precise MR-PET registration, it also increases PET signal variability and hence care should be taken when using it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The routines are then embedded in Python C extensions to be readily available for high-level manipulation of PET data in Python. Using NiftyPET , it has been possible to accurately assess the precision of MR-PET image registration, critical for accurate quantification of amyloid PET data ( 45 ). Also, the software was used for comprehensive analysis of the American College of Radiology PET phantom to estimate the spatial resolution of PET scanners ( 46 ) – information which is essential for performing a robust partial volume correction of amyloid PET images.…”
Section: Toward Open Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routines are then embedded in Python C extensions to be readily available for high-level manipulation of PET data in Python. Using NiftyPET , it has been possible to accurately assess the precision of MR-PET image registration, critical for accurate quantification of amyloid PET data ( 45 ). Also, the software was used for comprehensive analysis of the American College of Radiology PET phantom to estimate the spatial resolution of PET scanners ( 46 ) – information which is essential for performing a robust partial volume correction of amyloid PET images.…”
Section: Toward Open Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, with the specifically designed registration templates, we were able to achieve robust registration, which was assessed by running independent registrations for each noisy bootstrap PET image realization, finding that the registration does not produce detectable uncertainty above the intrinsic PET noise. Furthermore, based on previous research 30 and the visual inspection of registration, it can be surmized that more precise registration is also likely to be more accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we focus on evaluation of the precision (uncertainty) of the whole processing chain of acquisition, image reconstruction, registration, and analysis using bootstrap resampling of the list‐mode data. 29 , 30 Note that the bootstrap resampling does not account for the variability in filling or positioning of the phantom. The two phantom scans were resampled 50 times, resulting in 100 realizations for the two acquisitions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this analysis, we used a newly-developed multi-platform software AmyPET (https://github.com/AMYPAD/AmyPET), extending NiftyPET 27 . AmyPET enables robust quantification of PET scans while using SPM12 for core MR-PET image registration 28 , estimating amyloid/tau load with high quantitative accuracy and precision from raw count PET data to accurately account for common head motion. Protocol details for amyloid and tau PET acquisition are provided in eMethods 2 (supplementary material).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%