2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9091522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty Analysis of a GHG Emission Model Output Using the Block Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Simulation

Abstract: Uncertainty analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is becoming increasingly necessary in order to obtain a more accurate estimation of their quantities. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and non-parametric block bootstrap (BB) methods were tested to estimate the uncertainty of GHG emissions from the consumption of feedstuffs and energy by dairy cows. In addition, the contribution to variance (CTV) approach was used to identify significant input variables for the uncertainty analysis. The results demonstrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the uncertainty obtained from different uncertainty analysis methods, the ratio between the half-width of the 95% confidence interval and the mean of the model output, WSF, was used [40,47]. The ratio, termed U, represents the percentage uncertainty of the model output and is defined as U =…”
Section: Comparison Of the Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To compare the uncertainty obtained from different uncertainty analysis methods, the ratio between the half-width of the 95% confidence interval and the mean of the model output, WSF, was used [40,47]. The ratio, termed U, represents the percentage uncertainty of the model output and is defined as U =…”
Section: Comparison Of the Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is a futile attempt to find the parametric distribution of the AWARE CF data where the maximum value is 100. This is because the estimation of the parametric probability distribution may not capture extreme values [47] such as a maximum AWARE CF value of 100. There was no maximum CF value in August; however, in the case of June, 20% (9 years out of 45 years) of the CF data shows a maximum value of 100 (Table S1).…”
Section: Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution analysis for GHG emission is not a suitable method for finding key issues about the uncertainty of the results [7]. Therefore, it is a reasonable choice to identify significant input variables that require iteration of data collection through the CTV analysis and DQR.…”
Section: Rank Of the Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies, the contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the dairy sector is estimated to be 3-5% of the global GHG missions. In Korea, various efforts are being made to reduce GHG emissions in the dairy sector and there is a growing demand for accuracy [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, there were research efforts focusing on a variety of complexities and uncertainties in energy and environmental systems management [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Among them, stochastic programming methods are widely devised and analyzed to provide reliable assistance for decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%