2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties in the physical modelling of the wave overtopping over a rubble mound breakwater: The role of the seeding number and of the test duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inevitably introduces scale effects. Note that the experimental set-up in [28] is similar to the present one in terms of hydraulic parameters (e.g., water depth, wave characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This inevitably introduces scale effects. Note that the experimental set-up in [28] is similar to the present one in terms of hydraulic parameters (e.g., water depth, wave characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The work found that variability, due to the wave seeding, of the overtopping measured ranged from approximately between 8% and 15%, depending on the exact parameter of interest. Further work by [28] examined this same variability by considering a small set of laboratory experiments on a specific type of structure, namely a rubble mound breakwater. Similarly to numerical model results, it was shown that, when the probability of overtopping was less than 5% and for R * = R c /H m0 > 2 (where R c is the structure crest freeboard above the still water level and H m0 is the spectral significant wave height at the structure toe), the variability was higher, decreasing as overtopping discharges increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these studies still focus on simple cases and geometries rather than real-world scenarios. Few researchers have looked at the issue of wave run-up (e.g., Synolakis, 1987 and1991;Muller, 1995;Liu et al, 2005;Capel, 2015;Romano et al, 2015;Etemad-Shahidi et al, 2016), and most use empirical formulas or simplified approaches for wave run-up calculations, making assumptions about the lake geometry that may not be realistic (e.g., uniform water depth and a regularly sloped dam). 15…”
Section: Impulse Waves Generated From Avalanches and Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%