2003
DOI: 10.1086/346142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties in Spiral Galaxy Projection Parameters

Abstract: We investigate the impact of nonaxisymmetric structure on estimates of galaxy inclinations and position angles. A new minimization technique is used to obtain estimates of inclination and position angle from a global fit to either photometric or kinematic data. We discuss possible systematic uncertainties which are much larger than statistical uncertainties. Our investigation reveals that systematic uncertainties associated with fitting photometric data dominate the formal statistical uncertainties. For our sa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For late-type galaxies, these models often consider a symmetric velocity distribution, either by assuming a thin disc geometry (e.g., Barnes & Sellwood 2003;Epinat et al 2008) or symmetrical radial distortions with respect to some axis (Spekkens & Sellwood 2007). An alternative approach is a generalisation of the isophote fitting (i.e.…”
Section: Kinematic Position Angles From Velocity Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For late-type galaxies, these models often consider a symmetric velocity distribution, either by assuming a thin disc geometry (e.g., Barnes & Sellwood 2003;Epinat et al 2008) or symmetrical radial distortions with respect to some axis (Spekkens & Sellwood 2007). An alternative approach is a generalisation of the isophote fitting (i.e.…”
Section: Kinematic Position Angles From Velocity Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It works well when noncircular motions are small, but yields spurious variations of the parameters when the underlying flow contains nonaxisymmetric, especially bisymmetric, distortions. Barnes & Sellwood (2003) adopted a different approach. They assumed the plane of the disk to be flat and determined the rotation center, inclination, and PA by fitting a nonparametric circular flow pattern to the entire velocity map.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotcurshape program, recently added to the NEMO (Teuben 1995) package, suffers from the same drawback, because it also assumes a flat, axisymmetric disk. Furthermore, it fits multiple parametric components to a velocity field and thus has less flexibility than the Barnes & Sellwood (2003) technique. Franx et al (1994) and Schoenmakers et al (1997) pioneered efforts to measure and interpret the nonaxisymmetric coefficients that describe an observed velocity field, and expansions up to order m 0 $ 3 are now routinely carried out (e.g., Wong et al 2004;Chemin et al 2006;Simon et al 2005;Gentile et al 2006).…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, many galaxies appear to have lopsided light distributions (e.g., Zaritsky & Rix 1997;Kornreich et al 1998;Conselice et al 2000;Bournaud et al 2005), H i distributions (e.g., Baldwin et al 1980), integrated H i line profiles (Richter & Sancisi 1994), or kinematic features (e.g., Richter & Sancisi 1994;Swaters et al 1999;Kornreich et al 2000, Chemin et al 2006, especially in LSB galaxies (Swaters et al 2003;Simon et al 2003). However, a direct measurement of disk ellipticity is challenging because it is difficult to disentangle the intrinsic shape of galaxy disks from both projection effects and spiral structure (e.g., Rix & Zaritsky 1995;Schoenmakers et al 1997;Andersen et al 2001;Barnes & Sellwood 2003). If better estimates of ellipticity existed, tighter limits could be placed on halo triaxiality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%