2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties in power plant design point evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, PsepBT/τq95AR has been adopted as a divertor figure of merit. This differs from the divertor figure of merit for the pulsed European DEMO baseline from 2015 and therefore the work presented in [6], where Psep/τR was used.…”
Section: Physics Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, PsepBT/τq95AR has been adopted as a divertor figure of merit. This differs from the divertor figure of merit for the pulsed European DEMO baseline from 2015 and therefore the work presented in [6], where Psep/τR was used.…”
Section: Physics Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note that the majority of physics uncertainties has already been described in [6] but are included here for completeness.…”
Section: Physics Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The strongest sensitivities are found for the plasma elongation, confinement and density. Certainly the uncertainty on each parameter is not the same and in [21] a proposal for the probability distribution of system code input parameters is presented.…”
Section: Systems Code Sensitivity Analyses and Trade-off Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%