2000
DOI: 10.2307/4089587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertain Nest Fates in Songbird Studies and Variation in Mayfield Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For failed nests, Program MARK (White and Burnham, 1999) incorporates probabilities of failure for each day between the last observed active date and first observed inactive date; thus, no final exposure day is estimated (Dinsmore et al, 2002). If nest fate was not known, the termination date was assigned as the last day the nest was known to be active (Manolis et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For failed nests, Program MARK (White and Burnham, 1999) incorporates probabilities of failure for each day between the last observed active date and first observed inactive date; thus, no final exposure day is estimated (Dinsmore et al, 2002). If nest fate was not known, the termination date was assigned as the last day the nest was known to be active (Manolis et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated daily survival rates using the Mayfield (1975) method and constructed corresponding standard error estimates following methods described by Johnson (1979). We calculated exposure days for the Mayfield estimates using methods recommended by Manolis et al (2000). We restricted our definition of camera-free nests to those that occurred on the same plots as camera-monitored nests.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DINSMORE et al 2002). We feel it is important to point out, however, that there is some debate over the use of this method (WEIDINGER 2007), in particular the ways in which data should be collected and analyzed (MANOLIS et al 2000). For example, when there are records with uncertain outcomes, excluding these data biases the survival estimate if they do not have the same survival rate as the rest of the observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%