2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbundling the effects of host-country institutions on foreign subsidiary survival: A case for subsidiary heterogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more attractive the market, the more foreign investment in the host country, which means that a country can offer lower asset transfer costs, thus attracting investors. There is a positive relationship between market attractiveness and equity patterns [ 65 ]. Therefore, this paper selects the FDI of the host country in the year before the year in which the investment activities take place to measure the market attraction of the host country and uses its logarithm value in the calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more attractive the market, the more foreign investment in the host country, which means that a country can offer lower asset transfer costs, thus attracting investors. There is a positive relationship between market attractiveness and equity patterns [ 65 ]. Therefore, this paper selects the FDI of the host country in the year before the year in which the investment activities take place to measure the market attraction of the host country and uses its logarithm value in the calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional differences and economic development are two of the most important factors associated with firm survival (Gaur et al, 2019;Getachew & Beamish, 2021;Sartor & Beamish, 2020). The pattern of institutional and economic development generates regional differences, commonly captured in the trade literature by the classifications of North and South regions (Therien, 1999;Schamp & Stamm, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The institutional quality of a country's environment may vary substantially, and firms must adapt to the constraints imposed by the institutional environment of the countries in which they operate. Some studies have focused on how multinational firms from developed economies enter host markets that have a low level of institutional quality (Luo, 2005;Meyer, Estrin, Bhaumik, & Peng, 2009;Elg, Ghauri, Child, & Collinson, 2017), and how host country institutions impact firm's strategy (Svendsen & Haugland, 2011;Tang & Buckley, 2020) and subsidiary performance (Pattnaik, Choe, & Singh, 2015;Getachew & Beamish, 2021). Other research has analyzed the extent to which the home country's institutional environment either promotes or discourages the internationalization of emerging market firms, with mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%