2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.22.432198
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbiased choice of global clustering parameters for single-molecule localization microscopy

Abstract: Single-molecule localization microscopy resolves objects below the diffraction limit of light via sparse, stochastic detection of target molecules. Single molecules appear as clustered detection events after image reconstruction. However, identification of clusters of localizations is often complicated by the spatial proximity of target molecules and by background noise. Clustering results of existing algorithms often depend on user-generated training data or user-selected parameters, which can lead to uninten… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synaptic nascent protein localizations were further identified by a custom-written, noise-tolerant cluster identification algorithm (Density-based spatial clustering of applications with Noise based) (42), the spatial-distance parameter (r) of which was determined using the measured localization precisions for each dendrite. In particular, any cluster with <3 localizations within r was excluded from clustering, which is more selective than DBSCAN.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synaptic nascent protein localizations were further identified by a custom-written, noise-tolerant cluster identification algorithm (Density-based spatial clustering of applications with Noise based) (42), the spatial-distance parameter (r) of which was determined using the measured localization precisions for each dendrite. In particular, any cluster with <3 localizations within r was excluded from clustering, which is more selective than DBSCAN.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%