2018
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.281055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbiased Approach to Counteract Upward Drift in Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-β 1–42 Analysis Results

Abstract: This approach may also be useful to standardize Aβ 1-42 CSF concentrations across different centers and/or platforms, and to optimize use of CSF biomarker data collected over a long period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
152
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
152
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because CSF Aβ 42 , tau, and p-tau were not normally distributed, we logarithmically transformed them for these analyses. Because Aβ 42 samples were collected over a long period, we rescaled values of Aβ 42 according to recent insights from our group that Aβ 42 levels show a significant drift over time [35]. Because of their closely related biological functions, most proteins of the PRM assay were expected to correlate with each other within individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because CSF Aβ 42 , tau, and p-tau were not normally distributed, we logarithmically transformed them for these analyses. Because Aβ 42 samples were collected over a long period, we rescaled values of Aβ 42 according to recent insights from our group that Aβ 42 levels show a significant drift over time [35]. Because of their closely related biological functions, most proteins of the PRM assay were expected to correlate with each other within individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aβ 1–42 , phosphorylated tau (p‐tau), and total tau protein concentrations were measured using InnoTest sandwich ELISAs (Innogenetics, Fujirebio, Ghent, Belgium). The cut‐off for abnormal drift‐corrected CSF Aβ 1–42 was set at <813 ng/L (Tijms et al, ), at >375 ng/L for CSF total tau and at >52 ng/L for p‐tau (Mulder et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innotest calibrator concentrations ranged from 63 to 4000 pg/mL for Aβ42, 40 to 2300 pg/mL for t‐tau, and 16 to 1000 pg/mL for p‐tau. Cut‐points at our center were determined at 813 pg/mL for Aβ42 [15], 375 pg/mL for t‐tau, and 52 pg/mL for p‐tau [26]. The tubes analyzed by Elecsys were kept at −80°C until measurement within three consecutive days in May 2017 using the Elecsys Aβ42 CSF, Elecsys t‐tau CSF, and Elecsys p‐tau (181P) CSF assays (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) run on the cobas e 601 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interlaboratory variation of Innotest results has been reported to be >15% in an international quality control program (http://www.neurochem.gu.se/TheAlzAssQCprogram) [8]. Another complication is that for the Innotest an upward drift of Aβ42 values over time has been shown [8,13–15]. To reduce variation in manual immunoassays, multiplex assays or (semi)automated platforms are being developed [16–19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation