2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-004-0863-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unattractiveness of mated females to males in the parasitoid wasp Spalangia endius

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
3
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
40
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, males prefer virgin females because of their low preference (King, Saporito, Ellison, & Bratzke, 2005), high probability of fertilization (Bonduriansky, 2001) and advantage in sperm competition on the first copulation in some cases (Engqvist & Reinhold, 2006;Wedell, Gage & Parker, 2002). Males also prefer large females (Dosen & Montgomerie, 2004) because they produce more eggs than small females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, males prefer virgin females because of their low preference (King, Saporito, Ellison, & Bratzke, 2005), high probability of fertilization (Bonduriansky, 2001) and advantage in sperm competition on the first copulation in some cases (Engqvist & Reinhold, 2006;Wedell, Gage & Parker, 2002). Males also prefer large females (Dosen & Montgomerie, 2004) because they produce more eggs than small females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male mate choice has been studied in few parasitoid species (King et al 2005), only one of them being an egg parasitoid. In general, males should favor females that bring them a larger fitness gain either because they live longer, are more fecund or can find or subdue better hosts.…”
Section: Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males, for example, have to perceive female receptivity to concentrate efforts in potentially successful interactions (Bonduriansky 2001;King et al 2005) since courting a nonreceptive female would imply a waste of time and energy (Hoefler 2008). Females usually signal their receptivity by several ways, among which we may cite acoustic signals (e.g., Wirmer et al 2010), pheromones (e.g., Maxwell et al 2010), and mechanical signals (e.g., Waage 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%