2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unannotated single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TATA box of erythropoiesis genes show in vitro positive involvements in cognitive and mental disorders

Abstract: Background Hemoglobin is a tetramer consisting of two α-chains and two β-chains of globin. Hereditary aberrations in the synthesis of one of the globin chains are at the root of thalassemia, one of the most prevalent monogenic diseases worldwide. In humans, in addition to α- and β-globins, embryonic zeta-globin and fetal γ-globin are expressed. Immediately after birth, the expression of fetal Aγ- and Gγ-globin ceases, and then adult β-globin is mostly expressed. It has been shown that in additi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, using Web service SNP_TATA_Comparator (Ponomarenko M. et al, 2015) and in vitro experiments, we studied effects of SNPs in TATA boxes within core promoters of human genes to predict potential SNP markers, for example, markers of obesity (Arkova et al, 2015), autoimmune diseases (Ponomarenko M. et al, 2016), Alzheimer's disease (Ponomarenko P. et al, 2017), aggressiveness (Chadaeva et al, 2016), circadian rhythm disorders , anomalies of female reproductive potential (Chadaeva et al, 2018), erythropoiesis disorders (Sharypova et al, 2018), and resistance to anticancer therapy (Turnaev et al, 2016). Then, on the basis of our results and literature data, we made findings suggesting that SNPs that disrupt erythropoiesis are likely to be associated with cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders in humans (Ponomarenko M. et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Previously, using Web service SNP_TATA_Comparator (Ponomarenko M. et al, 2015) and in vitro experiments, we studied effects of SNPs in TATA boxes within core promoters of human genes to predict potential SNP markers, for example, markers of obesity (Arkova et al, 2015), autoimmune diseases (Ponomarenko M. et al, 2016), Alzheimer's disease (Ponomarenko P. et al, 2017), aggressiveness (Chadaeva et al, 2016), circadian rhythm disorders , anomalies of female reproductive potential (Chadaeva et al, 2018), erythropoiesis disorders (Sharypova et al, 2018), and resistance to anticancer therapy (Turnaev et al, 2016). Then, on the basis of our results and literature data, we made findings suggesting that SNPs that disrupt erythropoiesis are likely to be associated with cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders in humans (Ponomarenko M. et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Within Tikhonov’s regularization [ 61 ], this correlation ( Figure 2 a) characterizes a similarity between the ill-posed inverse problem of evaluating the transcriptional outcome of mutations in plant proximal promoters ( Figure 1 ) and the analogous well-posed problem for humans, which has already been solved using our public Web service Human_SNP_TATA_Z-tester [ 28 ] (see in-depth description in the Supplementary Materials [ 18 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]). With this in mind, Figure 2 depicts how we adapted it step-by-step for comparing between wildtype and mutant variants of the plant promoter DNA sequences under study in their effects on gene expression, i.e., our new Web service Plant_SNP_TATA_Z-tester created in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We processed DNA sequences by means of our public Web service Plant_SNP_TATA_Z-tester (e.g., Figure 3 a and Figure 6 ) created in this work, as depicted in Figure 2 . To this end, as its prototype, we used our previously developed Web service Human_SNP_TATA_Z-tester [ 28 ] (see description [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ] in the Supplementary Materials ), and we expanded it only with Equation (2) in line with Tikhonov’s regularization [ 61 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results: It allows to estimate how SNPs effect on the TATA-binding protein (TBP) binding affinity for the 70 bp proximal promoters in front of transcription start sites (TSS) of the human genes within our three-step model of TBP-promoter interaction [2] taking into account both nucleotide context and conformational together with physicochemical features of the B-helical double-stranded DNA [3]. Due to this we examined 15243 SNPs in question that yielded 3229 candidate SNP-markers aggravating or relieving the development of human diseases such as obesity [4], autoimmune disorders [5], subfertility [6], atherosclerosis [7], rheumatoid arthritis [8], hypertension [9], Alzheimer's disease [10], mental disorders [11] as well as SNP-markers of resistance to anticancer chemotherapy were also identified [12]. Conclusion: An independent selective experimental control verification [13,14] shown a significant linear correlation between the in silico-estimated and in vitro-measured values of the TBP-promoter affinity rates (r = 0.77; p < 0.000001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%