2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31653-1_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unambiguous Constrained Automata

Abstract: Abstract. The class of languages captured by Constrained Automata (CA) that are unambiguous is shown to possess more closure properties than the provably weaker class captured by deterministic CA. Problems decidable for deterministic CA are nonetheless shown to remain decidable for unambiguous CA, and testing for regularity is added to this set of decidable problems. Unambiguous CA are then shown incomparable with deterministic reversal-bounded machines in terms of expressivity, and a deterministic model equiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author would like to thank Thomas Finn Lidbetter (University of Waterloo) for telling me this topic. The author also thank to an anonymous reviewer for letting me know some known results on unambiguous CA [10] and pointing out that the decidability results presented in this note are also from those results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The author would like to thank Thomas Finn Lidbetter (University of Waterloo) for telling me this topic. The author also thank to an anonymous reviewer for letting me know some known results on unambiguous CA [10] and pointing out that the decidability results presented in this note are also from those results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…. , w k ) is always recognised by a deterministic CA, and its regularity and Parikh image are effectively computable [10]. In this note, we provide a self-contained (without the knowledge about constrained automata) description of a decidable, necessary and sufficient condition for the infiniteness of L(5w 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the class of 2DPA is equivalent to the class of UPA that is known to be closed under Boolean operations [3,17], we get the closure properties of 2DPA for free, although with non-optimal complexity. We show here that they can be realised in linear-time for intersection and union, and with linear state-complexity for the complement.…”
Section: Closure Properties and Comparison Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorems 15 and 16 together provide a characterization of those pairs of unambiguous two-way transducers T 1 , T 2 for which there is a bounded regular resynchronizer R such that T 1 ⊆ o R(T 2 ). The effectiveness of this characterization stems from the decidability of regularity of languages recognized by unambiguous Parikh automata [CFM13]. This result requires unambiguity and uses Presburger arithmetics to determine for each (simple) loop a threshold such that iterating the loop more than the threshold always satisfies the Parikh constraint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%