2007
DOI: 10.1038/448251c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UNAIDS rejects claims of exaggeration and bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the 'long-term wave' of an HIV epidemic is rarely fully appreciated. Furthermore, contrary to the argument that funding has been disproportionate to the burden of disease, De Lay & De Cock (2007) and Stuckler, King, Robinson & McKee (2008) suggest that spending on HIV prevention and treating AIDS illnesses has not been over and above the funding needed.…”
Section: Review Of the Aids-exceptionalism Debatementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Hence, the 'long-term wave' of an HIV epidemic is rarely fully appreciated. Furthermore, contrary to the argument that funding has been disproportionate to the burden of disease, De Lay & De Cock (2007) and Stuckler, King, Robinson & McKee (2008) suggest that spending on HIV prevention and treating AIDS illnesses has not been over and above the funding needed.…”
Section: Review Of the Aids-exceptionalism Debatementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Stillwaggon 2006). UNAIDS has responded by defending its record and emphasising that the challenge is to 'know the local epidemic'-i.e., the specific socio-economic context and cultural factors that structure HIV risk in different settings-and craft interventions accordingly (De Lay and De Cock 2007;De Cock and De Lay 2008). This increasingly open-ended and pragmatic stance, however, does not resonate well with the literature stressing the centrality of poverty in driving the AIDS epidemic, particularly in Africa (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…UNAIDS and WHO responded defensively, noting that those against AIDS exceptionalism attributed the UN agencies more power than they had to address the epidemic [ 37 ]. Research and policy looked to justify the role of HIV/AIDS programmes within broader health and development frameworks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%