2020
DOI: 10.3917/arch.192.0341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Un temple trop beau pour être vrai ? retour sur le « temple A » de Prinias (Crète)

Abstract: En 1907, les fouilles menées par Luigi Pernier à Prinias en Crète ont mis au jour deux bâtiments côte à côte dotés d’un foyer central. Ces édifices ont aussitôt été identifiés comme des temples. Mais alors que cette fonction a été abandonnée depuis pour le « Temple B », le « Temple A » reste considéré comme porteur du plus ancien témoignage de sculpture architecturale d’un temple grec, bien qu’en dehors du système des ordres. Les recherches récentes à Prinias appellent un réexamen critique de ce dossier. L’art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies engage with architectural writingstwo monographs on Vitruvius and Philon of Byzantium should be noted here (Nichols 2017;Santagati 2021)and related matters of proportion and alignment, building on more than a century of scholarly literature (Kanellopoulos and Petrakis 2018;Haselberger 2020;Tanner 2020;Borghini 2021). Inter-site comparison is fundamental to any archaeological analysis, but notable are the number of cross-cultural studies between Greek and non-Greek architectural traditions (Giaccone 2015;Thaler 2018;Lamaze 2019;Maner 2019;chapters in Lulof, Manzini and Rescigno 2019;Trümper, Adornato and Lappi 2019;Ward 2020). Others have applied new methods to old questions concerning the configuration of domestic and palatial architecture (Paliou, Lieberwirth and Polla 2014;Palyvou 2018;Thaler 2018), the preponderance focusing on social dynamics during the Bronze Agewhen a wealth of complex, multi-roomed structures can be analysed and compared in terms of access routes, intervisibility, and related computational approaches to spatial analysis.…”
Section: Design Construction and The Life-history Of Greek Monumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies engage with architectural writingstwo monographs on Vitruvius and Philon of Byzantium should be noted here (Nichols 2017;Santagati 2021)and related matters of proportion and alignment, building on more than a century of scholarly literature (Kanellopoulos and Petrakis 2018;Haselberger 2020;Tanner 2020;Borghini 2021). Inter-site comparison is fundamental to any archaeological analysis, but notable are the number of cross-cultural studies between Greek and non-Greek architectural traditions (Giaccone 2015;Thaler 2018;Lamaze 2019;Maner 2019;chapters in Lulof, Manzini and Rescigno 2019;Trümper, Adornato and Lappi 2019;Ward 2020). Others have applied new methods to old questions concerning the configuration of domestic and palatial architecture (Paliou, Lieberwirth and Polla 2014;Palyvou 2018;Thaler 2018), the preponderance focusing on social dynamics during the Bronze Agewhen a wealth of complex, multi-roomed structures can be analysed and compared in terms of access routes, intervisibility, and related computational approaches to spatial analysis.…”
Section: Design Construction and The Life-history Of Greek Monumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%