2022
DOI: 10.3167/ghs.2022.150206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Un)romantic Becomings

Abstract: Popular culture and media often portray school balls and proms as romantic spaces and having a date is perceived as the norm. While gender(ed) and heterosexual discourses continue to shape young people’s experiences, girls’ understandings of the school ball do not necessarily conform to dominant ideas. In this article, I draw on a new materialist ontology of sexuality to explore the relations in-between girls, dates, and the school ball. I examine ball-girl-date encounters as sexuality-assemblages comprising b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the making of heterosexual subjectivities is material and generated relationally by things, objects, forces, gender, bodies and body parts. As Ingram (2022) states, in schools, bodies are not just constructed but girls participate in doing bodies and heterosexuality through material and relational entanglements. The playground as an assemblage is a dynamic space involving sexual, material and affective forces but often this is erased by dominant notions of childhood sexual innocence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the making of heterosexual subjectivities is material and generated relationally by things, objects, forces, gender, bodies and body parts. As Ingram (2022) states, in schools, bodies are not just constructed but girls participate in doing bodies and heterosexuality through material and relational entanglements. The playground as an assemblage is a dynamic space involving sexual, material and affective forces but often this is erased by dominant notions of childhood sexual innocence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%