2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Un-gating and allosteric modulation of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel captured by molecular dynamics

Abstract: Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) mediate intercellular communication at synapses through the opening of an ion pore in response to the binding of a neurotransmitter. Despite the increasing availability of high-resolution structures of pLGICs, a detailed understanding of the functional isomerization from closed to open (gating) and back is currently missing. Here, we provide the first atomistic description of the transition from open to closed (un-gating) in the glutamate-gated chloride channel (Gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
33
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this annotation supports the conclusion that pore constriction or the gate is located differently in resting versus desensitized channels, which is consistent with recent mutagenesis and kinetic experiments (Gielen et al, 2015). Also, it suggests that pore closing by desensitization versus channel deactivation or ungating (Martin et al, 2017) would involve the polar reorientation of the pore-lining helices M2 in opposite directions, i.e., an inward untilting to straighten for deactivation, and further tilting in the outward direction for desensitization.…”
Section: Conclusion On the Wide-open And The Semi-open Structures Ofsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly, this annotation supports the conclusion that pore constriction or the gate is located differently in resting versus desensitized channels, which is consistent with recent mutagenesis and kinetic experiments (Gielen et al, 2015). Also, it suggests that pore closing by desensitization versus channel deactivation or ungating (Martin et al, 2017) would involve the polar reorientation of the pore-lining helices M2 in opposite directions, i.e., an inward untilting to straighten for deactivation, and further tilting in the outward direction for desensitization.…”
Section: Conclusion On the Wide-open And The Semi-open Structures Ofsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As a cautionary note, the interpretation of MD trajectories relies on the assignment of functional states to the structures used as starting points for the simulations, and it has been proposed that the initial GLIC and GluCl structures might represent desensitized states (Akabas, 2013). Still, recent molecular dynamics suggests that the main quaternary event concomitant with channel opening lies in the twisting (Martin et al 2017). This quaternary motion is coupled to a tilt of the M2 pore-lining helices, yielding a widening of the upper part of the channel that carries the activation gate.…”
Section: Gating Mechanism and Permeation Determinants Of Plgicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, recent molecular dynamics suggests that the main quaternary event concomitant with channel opening lies in the twisting (Martin et al . ). This quaternary motion is coupled to a tilt of the M2 pore‐lining helices, yielding a widening of the upper part of the channel that carries the activation gate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…18 In that study, we used the open GluCl structure 31 as template, removing the positive allosteric modulator ivermectin present in the original structure. To avoid the pore collapse after ivermectin deletion, observed also by other authors, 32,58,81 we employed an initial restraint on the hydrophobic rings to pull apart the hydrophobic sidechains, thus creating a water-accessible volume in the pore.…”
Section: The Apo Conformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%