Un cas aporétique de gentrification : la ville de Marseille1

Jourdan, S.

doi:10.4000/mediterranee.2788

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the contrary, this change in the economy has benefited to certain categories of graduates, leading, no doubt more than elsewhere, to strong inequalities within the working-age population. These inequalities, visible in the structure of the working-age population, are also visible in the urban geography, with, schematically, the "poor" neighborhoods in the North and the "rich" neighborhoods near the southern coast (Jourdan, 2008;Donzel, 2005;Ronai, 2009). In 2017, the 3rd Arrondissement of Marseille was the poorest administrative entity in metropolitan France with a poverty rate of 53%, versus 14.1% for France mainland and 18.2% for the whole of Aix-Marseille-Provence metropolitan area.…”

Section: A High Level Of Povertymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…In this case, the internal socio-economic polarization of these neighborhoods could be maintained for a long time. To characterize situations of relatively permanent internal socioeconomic polarization in neighborhoods, some authors speak of sporadic or incomplete gentrification (Jourdan, 2008;Bacqué & Fijalkow, 2006), combining the installation of well-off households and the maintenance of poverty cells. Considering the internal socio-economic polarization of neighborhoods as a simple phase of a continuous gentrification process resulting in the eviction of the working classes and the massive installation of the privileged classes thus seems far too simplistic (Giroud & Ter Minassian, 2016;Oberti & Préteceille, 2016).…”

Section: Internal Socio-economic Polarization: Assumptions and Explanatory Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The internal socio-economic polarization of urban neighborhoods, the case of Marseille

Gripsiou¹,

Bergouignan²

2022

Ingeo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The socio-economic inequalities of the different metropolitan neighborhoods have been carefully documented and analyzed in the social science literature. Starting from this premise, this article focuses on the less common neighborhoods in which two extremes coexist: very low-income households and high-income households. The objective is to identify the neighborhoods with a high internal socio-economic polarization, geolocate them in the urban space, characterize their population and housing stock, and measure their recent evolutionary trends. The empirical analysis focuses on the neighborhoods of Marseille (France), a city characterized by strong socio-spatial segregation between poor neighborhoods in the north and rich neighborhoods on the southern coast, and the presence of neighborhoods in which populations coexist with unequal resources. This empirical study is based on the fiscal and social data (Filosofi file) that allow knowing the income distribution and based on the census data to characterize the socio-demography and the type of housing of the population. In order to identify neighborhoods with intense internal socio-economic polarization and measure their evolution of income distribution, original poverty and wealth indexes have been developed, which synthesize the two extremes of this distribution. These neighborhoods with a high internal socio-economic polarization usually present certain distinctive aspects, such as their geographical location or a more or less rapid and intense gentrification process. However, some of them seem to escape this process, as evidenced by the contrasting trends in the recent evolution of income distribution and structural heterogeneity of the housing stock, in which small apartments and old buildings are very overrepresented.

show abstract

Section: A High Level Of Povertymentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Internal Socio-economic Polarization: Assumptions and Explanatory Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The internal socio-economic polarization of urban neighborhoods, the case of Marseille

Gripsiou¹,

Bergouignan²

2022

Ingeo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the long run, Euroméditerranée promises to positively impact the region's prevailing social problems, boost economic growth and enhance the city's international stature. This project has been criticised (Jourdan 2008), inter alia, for its neo-liberal market-oriented approach toward urban renewal, in the sense that elitist-driven policies espouse gentrification while destroying the social fabric and cultural diversity in the city centre. Changing the level of analysis, Bertoncello and Dubois (2010) recall that Euromediterranée did not -and does not -set out to initiate a process of gentrification but instead aims to conduct a vast operation of economic and urban regeneration, even if the impacts of such a process on the most vulnerable cannot be fully anticipated.…”

Section: Euroméditerranéementioning

confidence: 99%

Metropolising Marseille. Mission impossible? Challenges and Opportunities of Metropolisation Processes in the Métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence

Grésillon

Saussure

2021

RuR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marseille is broadly considered a postindustrial city in crisis, which has failed to achieve a functional reconversion and a change of narrative in the age of globalization. Over the last two decades, however, processes of regionalized and integrated metropolisation have had an impact on the city’s urban renaissance prospects. This paper identifies three central projects, which symbolically represent and concretely articulate different axes of Marseille’s metropolisation processes: Euroméditerranée (1995-*); The European Capital of Culture Marseille-Provence 2013; and the institutional creation of the Métropole d'Aix-Marseille-Provence. This paper proposes to approach metropolisation as a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Drawing on the three aforementioned cases, we analyze the different territorial-spatial scales affected, as well as the various geographic scales of governance stakeholders involved. Reflecting on their scopes of impact respectively, the aim of the study is to investigate the challenges and opportunities of multi-scalar metropolisation for Aix-Marseille-Provence, and to discuss to what extent this conflictual plurality might (not) be promising for a consensual metropolitan integration in the future.

show abstract

“…Malgré un contexte politique de soutien aux secteurs culturels et créatifs plus ancien et plus fort à Nantes qu'à Marseille (Caro, 2012 ;Fabiani, 2008), la construction des deux quartiers créatifs s'est faite par un entremêlement des logiques bottom-up et top-down. Celle-ci s'est accompagnée d'une gentrification partielle aux Olivettes et au Panier avec le maintien des populations les plus pauvres (Jourdan, 2008 ;Ville de Nantes, 2013).…”

Section: Du Quartier Ouvrier Au Quartier Créatifunclassified

Les quartiers créatifs : construction de clubs de travailleurs créatifs. Analyse croisée des quartiers du Panier (Marseille) et des Olivettes (Nantes)

Michel¹

2018

Annales De Géographie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Creative Quarters: Establishment of Creative Workers' Clubs. Cross Analysis of the Districts of Le Panier (Marseille) and Olivettes (Nantes)Basile Michel Docteur en géographie, chercheur associé au laboratoire Espaces et Sociétés (UMR ESO 6590), Université d'Angers Résumé L'agglomération spatiale d'activités culturelles et créatives (art, architecture, etc.) dans d'anciens quartiers ouvriers transforme des espaces partiellement en friche en quartiers créatifs. Ces derniers sont le lieu d'ancrage de réseaux collaboratifs de travailleurs créatifs marqués par des dynamiques collectives de partage mais aussi par une forme d'entre-soi. Afin d'éclairer les dynamiques qui façonnent les quartiers créatifs, cet article vise à tester l'hypothèse de la constitution d'un club de travailleurs créatifs au sein de ces territoires. Défini comme un regroupement volontaire d'individus autour de la jouissance exclusive de biens et de services, le club est porteur à la fois d'une logique inclusive et exclusive. Questionner son existence dans les quartiers créatifs introduit une réflexion autour du rôle joué par les travailleurs créatifs dans les dynamiques urbaines actuelles. Sur la base d'enquêtes qualitatives (168 entretiens), l'analyse des quartiers créatifs du Panier (Marseille) et des Olivettes (Nantes) montre qu'un club tend à se mettre en place dans ces territoires. Les travailleurs créatifs s'y regroupent pour bénéficier de biens et de services spécifiques. Ils contrôlent l'accès à ces ressources par des processus de sélection et de cooptation. Ils définissent un groupe exclusif de partage accessible seulement aux ayants droit.

show abstract

Un cas aporétique de gentrification : la ville de Marseille1

Cited by 11 publications

References 4 publications

The internal socio-economic polarization of urban neighborhoods, the case of Marseille

The internal socio-economic polarization of urban neighborhoods, the case of Marseille

Metropolising Marseille. Mission impossible? Challenges and Opportunities of Metropolisation Processes in the Métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence

Les quartiers créatifs : construction de clubs de travailleurs créatifs. Analyse croisée des quartiers du Panier (Marseille) et des Olivettes (Nantes)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About