2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UM171 Preserves Epigenetic Marks that Are Reduced in Ex Vivo Culture of Human HSCs via Potentiation of the CLR3-KBTBD4 Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising for two reasons. First, UM171a was suggested to share a common molecular pathway with tranylcypromine and potentially other LSD1 inhibitors, which can regulate the expression of both stem cell as well as classical and non-classical MHCI-related genes [ 34 , 35 ]. This may explain the functional discrepancy observed between MEF and MSC responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising for two reasons. First, UM171a was suggested to share a common molecular pathway with tranylcypromine and potentially other LSD1 inhibitors, which can regulate the expression of both stem cell as well as classical and non-classical MHCI-related genes [ 34 , 35 ]. This may explain the functional discrepancy observed between MEF and MSC responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular reaction to manipulation, whether it be ex vivo culture, electroporation, viral transduction, or exposure to foreign DNA, RNA, or protein, with varied stress responses, such as DNAdamage, inflammatory/antiviral, and senescence responses, may modify genomic repair, cell cycle progression, susceptibility to cell death, and engraftment potential. [117][118][119] Genetic modifiers and nongenetic factors such as epigenetic status and cell cycle stage may contribute to genome editing outcomes. [120][121][122] For ex vivo gene-modified products, genetic modification may be incomplete at the time of cell infusion.…”
Section: Potential Sources Of Variation In Engraftment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrate that the addition of UM171 and SR-1 to SGF (TPO, IL-6, SCF and FLT-3) supported selfrenewal of CD34 + -derived cells over a two-week expansion culture when compared to SGF or either UM171 or SR-1 added individually, which was most likely due to the fact that both molecules target different pathways (Boitano et al 2010;Chagraoui et al 2021). Previous expansion studies using TPO, FLT-3, IL-6, IL-3 and SCF (Petzer et al 1996) resulted in poor expansion and differentiation of CD34 + cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%