1986
DOI: 10.1017/s0263718900007044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ULVS XIV: Archaeozoological Evidence for Stock-raising and Stock-management in the Pre-desert

Abstract: This paper discusses the preliminary results of analysis of faunal material from eight sites of Romano-Libyan and Islamic date. The sites are located in the pre-desert of Tripolitania. The samples were in general small and the bones were not well preserved, the degree of fragmentation being high. Although a range of species is represented, the economic strategy depended upon the exploitation of sheep and goats. In the southern part of the study area gazelles were also of importance. Sheep and goats were raised… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grant, that from the very prolific midden KhlOOl in the settlement by gsur Kh41/1004, the skeletal material showed a marked rarity of bones from domesticates, sheep and goat predominating amongst the latter. This may indicate, if the results from this midden are typical of those in the Kharab, that animal husbandry for meat was not a major feature of the economy because stock would have competed for the same fields as cultivated plants, and the presence of bones of wild species (gazelle and antelope) suggests that hunting made an important contribution to the meat diet of the people in the wadi just as at the Wadi el-Amud farm (Clark 1986). Two samples from within this midden, recovered in 1980, were dated by the radiocarbon technique to the period (at 2 sigma level) AD 430-865 and AD 395-655.…”
Section: Wadi Umm El Kharabmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grant, that from the very prolific midden KhlOOl in the settlement by gsur Kh41/1004, the skeletal material showed a marked rarity of bones from domesticates, sheep and goat predominating amongst the latter. This may indicate, if the results from this midden are typical of those in the Kharab, that animal husbandry for meat was not a major feature of the economy because stock would have competed for the same fields as cultivated plants, and the presence of bones of wild species (gazelle and antelope) suggests that hunting made an important contribution to the meat diet of the people in the wadi just as at the Wadi el-Amud farm (Clark 1986). Two samples from within this midden, recovered in 1980, were dated by the radiocarbon technique to the period (at 2 sigma level) AD 430-865 and AD 395-655.…”
Section: Wadi Umm El Kharabmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There seems little doubt that these early pre-desert farms were substantial enterprises capable of producing oil and wine in surplus for the coastal markets. Animal husbandry at el-Amud, though, was very similar to the traditional Bedouin system on the evidence of the faunal remains from the middens, with gazelle hunting also important for the meat supply (Clark 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The move to agriculture did not mean that pastoralism was eliminated. Indeed, the archaeozoological evidence from the predesert indicates that stock-raising and management remained a significant part of the economy (Clark 1986). This evidence accords well with the idea that what occurred in the pre-desert was not a change in the subsistence economy per se, but a 'movement' along the pastoralism-agriculture continuum towards greater agricultural production.…”
Section: Charting the Transformation Of The Pre-desertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before this particular component of the UNESCO project, there was an almost complete lack of information on these subjects: regional-scale interpretations being obliged either to extrapolate ideas obtained from examination of materials excavated by the UNESCO team at the archaeological sites studied, or being dependent upon models of the character of ancient agricultural practices (see Barker^ al. 1991; Barker and Jones 1981;1982;Chatterton and Chatterton 1984;Clark 1986;Dorsett et al 1984;Gilbertson et al 1984;1987;in press;Hunt et al 1986;1987;Jones 1985;Jones and Barker 1980;1983;Van der Veen 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%