2007
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2007.898593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrawideband Optimized Profile Monopole Antenna by Means of Simulated Annealing Algorithm and the Finite Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite element method 1 (FEM) is an appealing numerical method for its geometrical versatility and robutness, but its CPU time reduces its attraction whenever dense meshing and high frequency resolution over a wide band are required. However, two-dimensional (2-D) FEM analysis can reduce its rather time-consuming characteristics and makes it compatible with CAD [33]. Moreover, some threedimensional (3-D) FEM strategies can be taken into account and make certain CAD possible [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method 1 (FEM) is an appealing numerical method for its geometrical versatility and robutness, but its CPU time reduces its attraction whenever dense meshing and high frequency resolution over a wide band are required. However, two-dimensional (2-D) FEM analysis can reduce its rather time-consuming characteristics and makes it compatible with CAD [33]. Moreover, some threedimensional (3-D) FEM strategies can be taken into account and make certain CAD possible [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antenna design space in mobile applications is usually limited; thus, designing a multiband antenna with satisfactory performances is challenging. To reduce the design complexity, several optimization techniques have been applied to wideband or multiband antenna design . However, the literature only straightforwardly applied various optimizers such as genetic algorithms (GAs), particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA), or invasive weed optimization (IWO) to a design instance at hand, but the nature of the problem of multiband antenna design has not yet been sufficiently clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful antenna optimization relies on a proper objective function that guides an optimizer to a promising solution sub‐domain. In general, conventional optimization methods for multiband antenna design apply either the maximum | S 11 ( f )| over sample frequency f or the sum of | S 11 ( f )| in decibel over sample frequency as the objective function to be minimized. The first objective function, namely, max(| S 11 ( f )|), is motivated by searching for a safe performance; that is, because the worst | S 11 ( f )| improves iteration by iteration, a wide and multiband performance should be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, analytical methods are not applicable any more. Several classical methodologies for the phased-array control have been proposed aimed at defining suitable strategies for the optimal synthesis of antenna arrays [4][5][6][7]. It was shown in [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] that the evolutional optimization algorithms such as the genetic algorithm, ant colony optimization, particle swarm optimization and colony selection algorithm are capable of performing better and more flexible solutions than the classical optimization algorithms and the conventional analytical approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%