“…Even in cases where these limitations are overcome, quantification is still a challenge because reference compounds and molar absorption coefficients of most supported species are not readily available. Nevertheless, UV–vis spectroscopy, when cleverly used, can provide a wealth of catalyst structural information (e.g., metal coordination, oxidation state, and dispersion), − which would otherwise be only available with less ubiquitous techniques, such as solid-state NMR, XPS, XANES, and EXAFS. TPR characterization of catalysts, when carried out properly (i.e., in the absence of transport limitations and with appropriately selected experimental conditions for optimum reduction profiles), − can also provide useful information about the presence of bulk and surface phases, degree of reduction, metal–support interactions, alloy formation, metal content, valence of metallic species, and, in some cases, mechanism, kinetics, and activation energy of reduction. − In the absence of complementary spectroscopic techniques, interpretations of TPR profiles for structural information (e.g., coordination, oxidation state, and dispersion) can be difficult.…”