1994
DOI: 10.1093/nar/22.3.506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraviolet light-induced cleavage of DNA in presence of iodoHoechst 33258: the sequence specificity of the reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While M2PB 20 shows clear binding to the nucleotide containing an AATT binding site no strong conclusions can be made regarding the interactions of 6, 7 or 19 with DNA, either in the presence, or absence of an AATT binding site. Cell localisation assays on HeLa cells with one of these derivatives (7) shows that this molecule does not enter the nucleus, in contrast to M2PB (20), a known DNA-minor groove binder which was assessed for comparison and shows significant nuclear uptake. These results suggest that the proposed chalcogen bonding interactions involving S, Se and Te in 6, 7, and 20 are not strong enough to impart the DNA minor-groove binding behaviour which is displayed by corresponding bisbenzimidazoles such as 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While M2PB 20 shows clear binding to the nucleotide containing an AATT binding site no strong conclusions can be made regarding the interactions of 6, 7 or 19 with DNA, either in the presence, or absence of an AATT binding site. Cell localisation assays on HeLa cells with one of these derivatives (7) shows that this molecule does not enter the nucleus, in contrast to M2PB (20), a known DNA-minor groove binder which was assessed for comparison and shows significant nuclear uptake. These results suggest that the proposed chalcogen bonding interactions involving S, Se and Te in 6, 7, and 20 are not strong enough to impart the DNA minor-groove binding behaviour which is displayed by corresponding bisbenzimidazoles such as 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 49.3, 66.5, 106.9, 113.9, 114. 1, 116.6, 122.4, 122.6, 123.1, 125.9, 128.8, 132.8, 132.9, 136.6, 138.2, 147.7, 147.9, 149.7, 150.1, 152.8, 164. (7). Woollins' reagent (107.9 mg, 0.203 mmol) was stirred in pyridine (0.5 mL) at room temperature under nitrogen for 30 min.…”
Section: -{2-[2-(pyrid-2-yl)-1h-benzo[d]imidazol-6-yl]benzo[d]thiazol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vivo radioprotection by methylproamine has been demonstrated in mouse jejunum using the Withers assay with a DMF of 1.2 -1.3. Methylproamine, like other DNA binding bi-benzimidazoles, has a binding preference for AT-rich sequences, the consensus binding site being 3-4 consecutive AT base pairs as established by footprinting (Harshman & Dervan, 1985) and affinity cleavage (Martin & Holmes, 1983;Martin et al, 1990;Murray & Martin, 1994) studies, and confirmed by X-ray crystallography studies .…”
Section: Methylproamine As a Dna Binding Antioxidantmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Assuming that base damage (BD) occurs more frequently than SSB (Ward, 1994b;Ward, 1994a), it is expected that the majority of OCDL are not frank DSB but contain two BD or BD and SSB in opposite strands . While isolated DNA lesions are generally repaired efficiently, OCDL are more difficult to resolve (Ward, 1981;Harrison et al, 1999;Georgakilas et al, established by footprinting (Harshman & Dervan, 1985) and affinity cleavage (Martin & Holmes, 1983;Martin et al, 1990;Murray & Martin, 1994) studies, and confirmed by X-ray crystallography studies (Martin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Dna Repair Genes/signaling In Hr and Ner Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%